This is definitely a process service, not a result service. Even if it is a risk agency, it is just that the lawyer shares the risk with you and tries to mobilize the lawyer's enthusiasm, rather than the lawyer locking the results for you. There is no such thing as entering a safe.
In the process of representation, lawyers will undoubtedly put a lot of effort and energy into investigating and collecting evidence, analyzing the case, and citing scriptures. These are things that the client cannot do and can only rely on more professional lawyers. .
In addition, during the trial process, grasping the direction of the litigation and communicating with the judge undoubtedly require more powerful lawyers, and the client himself is likely to struggle with nothing but enthusiasm. If you fail to hit the bull's-eye, the key points of the court's review are likely to be completely opposite, and the final result will naturally be affected.
The existence of lawyers is to make the litigation process more professional and to have a higher ability to deal with it. At least they will not suffer from details such as procedures. If the case itself can win, the existence of lawyers will To make this case more successful, and if the case itself has a higher probability of losing, the presence of a lawyer may also reduce this probability. At the same time, it is possible to catch the omissions in the other party's litigation process and pick up the case.