Brief introduction of criminal lawyer Yan Jun

On the afternoon of June 65438+1October15th, Beijing time, the defending champion Guangdong team and Zhejiang Guangsha team had another penalty dispute. At that time, Zhao, a player of Guangsha team, was seriously injured by Du of Guangdong team when stealing in the backcourt. It is outrageous that Du's violent behavior directly knocked out Zhao's two teeth. Zhao, who was seriously injured, was bleeding profusely, and the teammates of Guangsha team found the fallen teeth for the first time.

It is incomprehensible that referee Yan Jun, No.36 of this game, said nothing about such a violent foul. If Zhao, who was seriously injured at that time, did not exercise restraint, did not immediately counterattack the perpetrators, and did not protest against the referee, otherwise a large-scale conflict in this game would be inevitable.

Many netizens expressed their concern about the victim Zhao's tooth being knocked out at the first time and expressed their support for Zhao's serious injury. Everyone says that this is not an ordinary foul on the basketball court, but it has escalated into a violent crime. Everyone hopes that chinese basketball association will severely punish Du, the abuser!

It is normal for CBA to have fierce confrontation and physical contact and collision. However, in sports competitions, it is not as simple as a general foul to attack an opponent with bad violence without initial loyalty.

I also contacted a professional lawyer at the first time, and it depends on whether the perpetrator is intentional or unintentional to distinguish whether it is a violent crime. Another point is whether the injured party is recognized as disabled or not. In this game, the perpetrator undoubtedly hit Zhao on purpose, causing Zhao to be seriously injured, and Zhao's two teeth were knocked out and needed disability identification. But the tooth was knocked out, which was basically enough for secondary disability.

Another controversy in this game is that Zeng Fanri's foot-padding behavior towards Sun Minghui is equally annoying. However, the No.36 referee Yan Jun turned a blind eye to these two serious violations. There are two such major missed judgments in a game, which has also caused dissatisfaction among many fans.

In particular, the game was shown to the national audience under the live camera of CCTV. Does referee No.36 have a moral bottom line that a professional referee should have? Twice, he told the perpetrator that it was all right, and it was time for chinese basketball association to take action against the No.36 referee. Whether it is referee Yan Jun or Du and Zeng Fanri, the focus of the foul in this game, chinese basketball association must impose additional punishment on them and not severely punish violent crimes. God bless!