1. Lawyers have more freedom than judges.
Lawyers' time is basically at their own disposal, except for attending some law firm studies and a small number of meetings, most of the time can be at their own disposal. As long as the court date is not forgotten, other work can be arranged freely and adjusted reasonably. Lawyer's time is like water in a sponge. Squeeze it and it will come.
2. Compared with judges, lawyers have higher incomes and higher ceilings.
Although lawyers will encounter income bottlenecks when they start practicing, even in the first three years, they will get as many projects as judges. Once a lawyer has worked for more than five years, his income will increase obviously with the increase of experience and case source.
Compared with judges, the work pressure of lawyers is much less.
Some people say that lawyers have the pressure from the source of the case and the pressure to handle the case, while judges only have the pressure to handle the case, and lawyers should have greater pressure. In fact, the pressure on lawyers to handle cases is relative, mainly because they practice more in the early stage. The source of the case is relatively stable in the later period, and there will be no too much pressure.
As for the pressure of handling cases, lawyers will be much easier than judges. The contrast in this respect is not because of the tenure of judges, but mainly because the work intensity of judges is too strong. At present, a grass-roots judge has to handle at least 200 cases a year, and in some places there are even more than 300 cases. Therefore, judges are basically busy hearing, writing judgments, serving them and so on. Every day, and the schedule is full