The focus of public concern is whether those who did bad things have been punished. Lawyers care about the cases they are in charge of. Have they achieved their defense goal of answering questions for defenders? For example, this man should have been put to death, but under the argument of this dialectical lawyer, he returned to court, and it was indefinite. This is a very great sense of accomplishment for lawyers, and it is a sense of professional accomplishment, because the existence of the profession of lawyers is originally to defend defenders. He can be a defender whose interests are damaged or a defender who infringes on the interests of others.
Publicizing on the public platform, this strange lawyer who is easy to arouse the public wants to express his meaning. Maybe the drug dealer should have been sentenced to death, but under my defense, I successfully overturned the case, which shows that my legal defense means are particularly powerful. This is a sense of professional accomplishment, but the public is concerned about this drug dealer. He should have been punished for doing something seriously illegal, but he was not punished under his excuse. Even if they were not punished, lawyers posted on public platforms to show off, and then this different concern caused conflicts.
There is no doubt whether lawyers should defend the bad guys. What is a bad guy, that is, the public thinks he has done some bad things, but is it possible that there will be unjust, false and wrong cases? Originally, he was only a suspect, and there was no effective evidence to prove that he had done something bad. What if there is no lawyer to defend him and legal knowledge is not misjudged? Lawyers exist to make the law fair and just, and make a fair judgment by integrating the interests of all parties.