All 13 people involved in this case were acquitted? In view of the criminal facts accused by the original public prosecution agency? Later, the Longfeng District Procuratorate believed that 13 involved persons had unclear charges and insufficient evidence? What's more, the defendant did not constitute a criminal act? So the Longfeng District Court changed all the charges of 13 defendants? .
According to relevant news reports, we can also know that all 13 people, including Yang Ming, were acquitted after the second trial. At present, Liang Ming and Liang Zhu have not applied for state compensation because they are isolated from other places due to the epidemic? The remaining 1 1 people have applied to the state for compensation? . Because this case was wrongly tried by the relevant departments of our country? If innocent people have suffered undue punishment, they can apply for state compensation according to the relevant laws and regulations of our country? .
This case happened on May 8, 20 18, and was criminally detained on suspicion of illegal detention. Since then, the relevant personnel have been charged with a series of crimes, such as forced trading, disrupting production and operation, extortion, and forging the seal of public institutions? . In June of that year 165438+ 10, Heihe city court made a first-instance judgment on this case and sentenced the defendant to fixed-term imprisonment? And fined (Liang Ming was sentenced to 20 years in prison? Other 12 people were sentenced to different fixed-term imprisonment respectively? )? .
But this 13 people refused to accept it and appealed? However, after the second trial of the Intermediate People's Court, 13 defendant still refused to accept the complaint and filed the above complaint with the Heilongjiang Provincial High Court? Finally 13 the defendant was acquitted? . Is there a loan relationship between the defendant and Hong Xin Company? Due to the company's arrears? Even take the defendant to court? . According to the defendant's description, there was no result in negotiating with the company for money at that time, which also led to being framed and imprisoned by the company.
Up to now, the company has signed more than 20 million contracts for the defendant, including project funds and farmers' wages? . The facts of this case are unclear and the evidence is insufficient, but the relevant court convicted the defendant and even sentenced him to fixed-term imprisonment and fined him. Such punishment is unreasonable? . Meanwhile, the defendant appealed? Refuse to accept the court's decision and ultimately safeguard your legitimate rights and interests? . When we encounter such a thing in our life, we must take up legal weapons to protect our legitimate rights and interests from infringement? .