Today, 20 years after the incident of beating a teacher, it was decided in the People's Court of Luanchuan County, Henan Province. The court sentenced the defendant to fixed-term imprisonment of 1.6 months for the crime of stirring up trouble, and often appealed in court. On the afternoon of 1, the defense lawyer visited Chang in Luanchuan County Detention Center.
No matter what the reason, it is not advisable to take revenge on teachers. Often not only pleaded guilty in court, but also reached a * * * informed in public? It has been more than half a year since it happened, and the dust has finally settled in the first instance. However, the specific details of the court's sentencing and trial, as well as the public security incident that everyone generally thought at first, are all questions about why the defendant was finally sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment by the court of first instance.
Question 1
Zhang's excessive corporal punishment of students is indeed undocumented.
In response to a reporter's question, the presiding judge of this case pointed out that Zhang Dui Chang's education method was obviously improper, and the victim could not be determined to be at fault. There is no evidence in this case that the teacher severely punished the defendant nearly twenty years ago.
In the first trial of the incident, Tian Zhanzhu, vice president of Luanchuan Experimental Middle School, testified in court that this person was a little introverted in his usual work, but he did not find other students (known as teacher Zhang's corporal punishment) or violations of teachers' ethics. He should be a more responsible teacher.
However, according to the confessions often made in court and previous media reports, Chang and other students were indeed subjected to excessive corporal punishment by Zhang.
After the June 5438+February incident last year, Jinyun journalists came to Luanchuan. In a random interview at the entrance of Yachuan Experimental Middle School, a sophomore in junior high school saw two students being physically punished by Zhang when he was a freshman.
Chang's wife, Hongmou, said that Chang himself is fair and responsible and is by no means a timid person. If Mr. Zhang hit him too hard and left him with mental trauma, he often wouldn't have such an emotional reaction. We say Chang Yao (his family used to be Chang) is kind and kind, not washing him. Hongmou said.
The Luanchuan County Education and Sports Bureau recently said in response to a netizen's question about the teacher case: In the 1980s, there were some simple and hard methods in education.
Question 2
Some students withdrew their certificates. Why?
In the process of case preparation, defense lawyers and their families have witnesses to withdraw their testimony.
Chang's wife, Hongmou, told Jinyun that four or five students of Chang withdrew their testimony in the process of preparing the case. It turned out that these testimonies were all ready and signed, and those students had to return them because of the company's requirements. These students know Chang's situation very well, but the pressure can only be taken back. We also understand other people's practices and can't let people take risks.
Hong said: at that time, things just happened, and they took the initiative to come forward and ask for testimony.
In stark contrast to these positive evidences that prove that Zhang Moulin's corporal punishment is excessive, Tian Zhanzhu, vice president of Luanchuan Experimental Middle School, first said in the trial that Zhang Moulin's corporal punishment of students was not found. During the trial, the defense lawyer asked Zhang Moulin whether there was often corporal punishment, and who spread the school's complaints against Chang on the Internet? When waiting for five questions, Tian Zhanzhu answered irrelevant questions and refused to answer them. The scene was very embarrassing.
Question 3
Has Zhang Molin been hiding his wishes?
Half a year after the incident, Zhang, who had only been interviewed by the media once, still disappeared.
Chang's father, aunt, wife and other friends came to Zhang Molin's house more than 20 times before and after to apologize, but Zhang Molin did not respond positively. Chang's wife Hongmou has been here three or four times, and Teacher Zhang's house is sometimes closed. Occasionally, the child said: Dad is not at home, you go! When Chang's family members talk to Zhang on the phone, sometimes the other party doesn't come out, and sometimes they hang up directly after knowing Chang's family members.
Hong said: I thought people might not want to see us, so I invited the village cadres to visit, and Teacher Zhang didn't say anything.
Only once, when Chang's family looked for Zhang's lover Zhang, he said that the school and the education bureau were very annoyed and we didn't tell them.
Through this attitude of Zhang, it seems that Chang is not going to be sent to prison. A few months ago, Zhang said in a video interview with the media: As long as he apologizes publicly, I will admit that he is a student, and I will speak for him when it is his turn.
However, since this attitude has been made, has Zhang Molin been avoiding his family? We hoped that Mr. Zhang would appear in court and make peace, but Mr. Zhang did not appear in the two trials.
As a victim of common behavior and a direct related person, Zhang's invisibility puzzled many people.
A neighbor who knows Zhang Molin told Jin Yun reporter: In fact, Mr. Zhang personally thinks that it is normal not to show up. He was wearing a tight hood, and he was under great psychological pressure when he went out a few months after the murder. He must be thinking that the waves will pass as soon as possible No matter the incident, the first trial or the second trial, every node hurt him, and no one wanted to show up.
Question 4
Does personal resentment need to rise to other levels?
During the trial, it was often claimed that there was a personal feud between him and Mr. Zhang, not because of the whole teachers' group, but because Mr. Zhang had carried out excessive corporal punishment on himself.
But the case finally appeared in the form of a public prosecution case. In the indictment, the prosecutor said: Chang's behavior not only undermined the stability of social order, but also impacted the values established by the public. Chang's behavior not only seriously insulted Zhang, but also seriously affected the work and life of Zhang and his family, seriously violated the traditional virtue of respecting teachers and attaching importance to education of the Chinese nation, caused a bad social impact and undermined social public order? Destroyed social ethics and public order and good customs.
In this way, the isolated incident of beating teachers in the eyes of netizens has risen from the personal feud between Chang and Zhang to the challenge to the whole teacher group, teachers' dignity and social public order and good customs. This change has also brought many problems.
The Chang family believes that the relevant performance of the public prosecutor and the court is as exaggerated and unacceptable as the complaint issued by the school in the name of the teacher at the time of the incident.
Hong said that in the indictment, Chang Yao was called scum and evil forces, and now he has turned public safety incidents into criminal incidents, expressing personal dissatisfaction with Chang Yao's challenge to social stability and values. We don't know what this is like.
Question 5
Is the sentence too heavy?
The court sentenced Chang Renyao to one year and six months' imprisonment, which was unacceptable not only to Chang Ren Yao and his family, but also to many members of the public.
Hong said: Not only was he found guilty, but his sentence was also very heavy.
A netizen said: One and a half years' imprisonment is too heavy. I feel that the suspension is a disciplinary action, which is in line with the seriousness of the incident.
Another comment: one year and six months is a bit heavy, and one year is acceptable to his family. He was detained for more than half a year with a short sentence.
However, different positions seem to have different views. Zhang Molin's neighbor is also an educator in Luanchuan County. The judge's sentencing is considered from the legal level, and the punishment is too light to play a corresponding disciplinary and binding role. Objectively tolerating students who manage teachers by unreasonable means may lead to more adverse events.
Since Chang hangzhou east railway station was arrested, the first court session last month was the first time that his wife Hong met him. Today's judgment is the second side of the meeting. I think he is thinner than the last trial!