Before the trial, can the defense lawyer inform the defendant of the confession of the accomplice?

According to Article 5 of the Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in Criminal Cases, the defendant and his defenders proposed that the defendant's pre-trial confession was illegally obtained before or during the trial, and the court should investigate it in court first after the public prosecutor read out the indictment. Before the end of the court debate, the defendant and his defenders suggested that the defendant's pre-trial confession was illegally obtained and the court should also conduct an investigation. Article 6 The defendant and his defenders claim that the defendant's pre-trial confession was obtained illegally, and the court shall require him to provide relevant clues or evidence such as the person, time, place, method and content suspected of illegally obtaining evidence. Lawyer Wang Cheng's interpretation: This article mainly stipulates that the initial responsibility for starting the investigation procedure of evidence legality lies with the defendant and his defender, and requires relevant clues or evidential materials. Article 7 If, after examination, the court has doubts about the legality of the defendant's pre-trial confession, the public prosecutor shall provide the court with the interrogation record, the original audio and video recordings of the interrogation process or other evidence, and request the court to notify other people present at the interrogation or other witnesses to testify in court. If the suspicion of extorting a confession by torture cannot be ruled out, the court shall require the interrogators to testify in court to prove the legality of the confession. If the public prosecutor is unable to testify in court, he may suggest that the court postpone the trial according to the provisions of Article 165 of the Criminal Procedure Law. After being notified according to law, interrogators or other personnel shall testify in court. Explanatory materials with official seals submitted by the public prosecutor, which have not been signed or sealed by the interrogators concerned, cannot be used as evidence to prove the legality of the evidence obtained. Both the prosecution and the defense can cross-examine and debate the legality of the defendant's pre-trial confession.