Whatever the reason, after being abducted by Wu, the father and son were forced to separate 10 years, and the family was almost torn apart 10 years. How many times have we seen Sun Haiyang standing in the street with a picture of a child waiting for news? After all, it is unreasonable to find no evidence that Wu received the money, so it is necessary to lightly sentence the other party. You know, more than 10 years ago, mobile payment was not popular, and most people in rural areas traded in cash, so it is difficult to keep such transaction evidence. With such a case, it is typical in the front. Even in the future, traffickers are likely to avoid cameras and crowds for cash transactions during the transaction. Once this happens, will all traffickers be arrested in the future and can be treated as kidnapping?
Once the cost of trafficking is reduced, it cannot be contained. The law should protect the rights of victims, not make excuses for traffickers to avoid their responsibilities. Imagine abducting countless children and making millions. Even if you have to bear the risk of being caught, as long as you don't find that the traffickers have money transactions, it will take only five years for the traffickers to make a comeback. People who can be traffickers have almost no moral bottom line, let alone know what shame is. It is basically impossible for such people to correct their evil deeds with five years' punishment. What's the point of such a useless criminal law?
Listen to the voice on the internet, parents shouting their children's names, begging scenes, and grandparents whose children can't close their eyes. Did the court consider this in its judgment? The law is dead, but people are alive. If the existing legal provisions are found to be insufficient to support the legal system, can the loopholes be fixed? This paper shows that it will not only hurt Sun Haiyang families, but also hurt countless families who have lost their children.