The main facts ascertained by the court are:
From February, 20 18 to July, 20 19, the defendant Huang Yiqing, together with the drug buyer Yu moumou, sold five packs of * * * about 80 grams of "ice" to Yu moumou at his home and nearby five times.
For this result, most people who eat melons think that people are happy, a few think that the sentence should be light and indefinite, and some think that Zhou Libo and Yi Huang Qing should be cellmates and should go to prison to eat and lose weight together.
Lawyer Huang Yiqing's defense speech, released in Weibo, is a lengthy apology for Yi Huang Qing, arguing that Huang Yiqing was secretly retaliated by Zhou Libo without evidence and witness testimony and was framed and convicted.
The writing of the defense is rough and the logic is a bit chaotic. At least two pages can be written in a few words, and the author can really feel the lawyer's dedication and the frustration that more than half of the agency fee may be deducted after losing the case.
Because the defense is smelly and long, so I won't comment word for word, just pick a few points and spit it out.
First of all, the lawyer's defense is not a factual part of the court investigation, but a lawyer's unilateral statement and his own views on the case. We have been fooled by those bloody legal dramas all the year round, and it is easy to think that lawyers fool the court by talking. As long as you have Zhao Benshan's eloquence, you can fool any case. In fact, modern justice is not the case. The court is accusing the defendant and the defendant of giving evidence around a core argument. Whoever has a more complete chain of evidence and who can point to his own point of view more clearly will win the case.
Just like in No Man's Land, the police have a lot of evidence to prove that the boss sold an eagle to violently resist the law, but Pan Xiao found a key evidence, which blocked the police's evidence chain and led to the boss's acquittal, which is more in line with the portrayal of modern justice.
Lawyer Huang Yiqing's defense is full of emotion and blood, and there is almost no substantive evidence to refute it. He just kept asking questions to the judiciary and refused to admit cross-examination in court. This discussion of wallowing on the ground is closer to the lawsuit of ancient yamen, such as the plot in Judge Death Reverses His Case and Nine-rank Sesame Officer. Whoever drowned more was responsible, and the master believed more.
Defense lawyers believe that Huang Yiqing was retaliated because Weibo accused the police of providing an umbrella for Zhou Libo, so he should produce corresponding evidence to prove such a thing. In addition, he believes that this revenge caused Huang Yiqing to be framed and persecuted. Obviously there was no drug trafficking, but he was convicted by an imaginary witness's testimony.
To tell the truth, Huang Yiqing, a man who blasted at the Weibo, will not be arrested by the police for shooting indiscriminately and then forcibly accused of drug trafficking. This statement is an overestimation of Yi Huang Qinghe Zhou Libo. If Zhou Libo really has so much energy to manipulate the judiciary, he wouldn't have to keep posting articles accusing the Youth League of listing him as a negative textbook for drug control.
Although Huang Yiqing's trial materials are not made public at present, I believe that the judicial authorities can't convict him only by the dictation of a few witnesses, and also sentenced him to the highest 15 years in prison. There must be a relatively complete chain of evidence to prove the fact that Huang Yiqing sold 80 grams of methylpropylamine.
The reason why lawyers use the spring and autumn brushwork to avoid the important and avoid the light is only to carry out their business, and it cannot be used as evidence.
I believe that people like Huang Yiqing will never be tolerated by the judiciary and the state's attitude towards drug control, and Zhou Libo will definitely be punished fairly in the near future.