On March 23, the attorney of the case said that there was no vendetta between the two sides, and the case was classified as a kidnapping case. The public security organ has applied to the procuratorate for approval to arrest the suspect. In addition, Duan repeatedly failed to pay off his debts and refused to execute the effective judgment of the court for 6 times, amounting to 6 13 13449 yuan.
The missing place is near Taihe Garden, Hehua Village, Xiaguan Town, Dali City, Yunnan Province. The boy's parents are from Nanjing, Jiangsu. He is wearing a black down jacket and a hat. The notice said that a cartoon image of a little girl was printed on the gray jumpsuit.
The doll was lost in Lianhua Village. Hundreds of grandparents in the village are looking everywhere, hoping that brothers and sisters, uncles and mothers can see and forward them. "Some news mentioned that if you find the situation, you can call the police or contact the Lotus Village Committee quickly.
On March 13, Dali police reported that a 7-month-old baby was abducted by people from Taiwan Province Province at around 22: 00 on March10/3. After unremitting efforts, the suspects Duan XX (female, 50 years old, from Kunming) and Zhao Moumou (male, 42 years old, from Dali) have been arrested and the child's body has been found.
Why did they take the baby boy and kill him? It is reported that the suspect knew the baby's parents, followed them to invest a certain monetary loss of 6.5438+0 million on the Internet, and took their children to retaliate against each other.
This statement was quickly denied. Yunnan Yunling Law Firm, which represented the case, said on March 9/KLOC-0 that the children's parents came to Dali twice on 20 17 and 20 18. 20 19 After the baby was born, the family went to Dali again and stayed in Duan Kai's homestay for three times.
On 20 18, Duan xx sold a meteorite to the baby's parents for 80,000 yuan. There is no other money transaction between the two sides except paying the room rate and the meteorite transaction, and there is no hostility.
"After someone and his partner kidnapped a 7-month-old baby, they showed that the child's father sent a WeChat to let him see the kidnapping of Li Ka-shing's son for ten times." The law firm said that this fully proved that the murderer planned to kidnap and blackmail the baby.
Li Zeju, the eldest son of Li Ka-shing, the richest man in China, was kidnapped by Zhang Ziqiang on 1996. Li Zeju was released only after Li Zekai paid two ransoms totaling HK$ 654.38 billion and RMB 38 million.
On March 23, Yu Huaixing, the attorney of the case, published an article in today's headline, saying that the cause of death of the baby was "mechanical asphyxia caused by covering the nose and mouth", which has been confirmed by the judicial authorities. The public security organ has requested the procuratorate to approve the arrest of the suspect, and the case is under trial.
The lawyer said that Duan X, the criminal suspect, was included in the list of people who were executed for breach of trust by Wuhua District Court and Panlong District Court of Kunming because he refused to perform five effective judgments of the court. The unpaid amount of these five cases is as high as 6 1 13449 yuan. At the same time, other debt cases have been discovered.
According to the court judgment, Zhongmou filed a lawsuit, claiming that he lent Duan 3.7 million yuan and 5 million yuan in 2009 and 20 10 respectively, but after the other party repaid part of the money, the remaining principal totaled 5.68 million yuan. Because the loan occurred during the existence of the husband-wife relationship and belonged to the same debt, Duan xx's husband also filed a lawsuit with the court.
However, Duan did not appear in court, and her ex-husband said: "(We) separated in 2007 and had no contact, and filed for divorce on 20 12. She has nothing to do with her son. We have never used her. " In addition, the feelings between Zhong and Duan, who have lived together for nine years, are malicious and invalid.
The court found through trial that in April of 20 10, Zhongmou signed a memorandum of understanding agreement with Duan, agreeing to lend money to the latter company to buy shares. Because of its inability to pay the memorandum of understanding, Zhongmou paid 4.4 million yuan (excluding the interest of 600,000 yuan, except for the right to borrow 3.7 million yuan, Zhongmou said that he no longer advocated it).
The court ruled that Duan XX repaid the loan within a certain period of time. Because the loan was not used for the husband and wife to live together, his ex-husband did not bear the same repayment responsibility. The final judgment section XX repaid the principal of 4 18 yuan in 4056.