The trial of Zhao Zhihong case.

In 2005, Zhao Zhihong, a serial rapist and murderer in Inner Mongolia, was arrested. He confessed that he was the "real murderer" in the1996 "4.9" female corpse case, not Hugue Gilletu who had been executed. Because of his participation in the "Hugue case", Zhao Zhihong was sentenced to death in the first instance and never held a second trial. During his detention in the detention center, Zhao Zhihong wrote an application for living compensation and was willing to take responsibility for the case.

In the year when Zhao Zhihong was arrested, his mother Liu Ainu learned from the police of the Public Security Bureau that her son had committed rape. From then on, her son Zhao Zhihong was "a bad guy" in her eyes. Liu Ainu once told the French evening reporter that she was willing to apologize to the parents of the two victims if it was a wrong case. 20 14 12 15 after learning that Hugue Gilletu was acquitted, Liu Ai Nu apologized to Hugue's mother by phone and said "I'm sorry".

20 14 12 15 after Hugue Jiletu was declared "not guilty" by the Inner Mongolia High Court, Weibo 16, the official of the Inner Mongolia People's Procuratorate, announced that Zhao Zhihong, another "protagonist" of the case, had been additionally prosecuted by the Hohhot Procuratorate according to law, and the Hohhot Intermediate People's Court would hold a hearing on another day. According to the news, on the morning of June 65438+February 65438+June 6, the People's Procuratorate of Hohhot examined the "4.9" case of1996 and accused Zhao Zhihong of intentional homicide and rape. On October 28th, 2006/KLOC-0, the Intermediate People's Court of Hohhot conducted the first trial of Zhao Zhihong's case. According to the memory of a judicial cadre who participated in the trial of this case, among the 10 rape and murder cases accepted by the public prosecution agency in Zhao Zhihong, except the "4 9" murder case, nine cases were prosecuted (handled in parallel at the same crime scene). Zhao Zhihong pointed out this problem on the spot: "The first case I handled was the case of a female corpse in a toilet. Why didn't the procuratorate prosecute? Why didn't anyone mention it at the trial? " At that time, the trial site was very embarrassing: which defendant took the initiative to take the blame? Several bailiffs kept order at the scene, and at the prompt of the presiding judge, Zhao Zhihong was prevented from talking about this matter in more detail. After that, the case continued to be heard, and Zhao Zhihong was sentenced to death in court, waiting for the second trial of the Provincial High Court.

"Just as everyone was preparing to execute Zhao Zhihong, the procedure suddenly came to an abrupt end, and the second trial also stopped ... Later, I heard that the instructions of the central leadership had spread to Inner Mongolia, requesting a retrial of the' 4 9' female corpse case." After that, there was no trial in the second instance, and Zhao Zhihong was taken back to the detention center. Earlier, Li, a spokesperson for the Higher People's Court of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, said that whether the "4.9" female corpse case was the real murderer needed to be confirmed according to law through the trial of the case.

On the evening of 2015,6543814, Shang aiyun, the mother of Hugue Gilletu, told the French evening reporter that it was a fact that Hugue Gilletu did not kill anyone, regardless of whether the real murderer was Zhao Zhihong or not. Although her son's retrial judgment has come out and the court has served the state compensation decision, she and her wife still want to attend the trial of Zhao Zhihong's case. "We just want to hear for ourselves what Zhao Zhihong will say about this case in court." Shang Aiyun said.

20 15 1.5, the Zhao Zhihong case was heard in Hohhot Intermediate People's Court. In the afternoon, Zhao Zhihong's case of intentional homicide, rape and robbery was not heard in public.

20 151October 7, Hohhot intermediate people's court held a public hearing on the case of robbery and theft of the defendant Zhao Zhihong accused by Hohhot people's procuratorate.

2065438+On February 26th, 2005, the court of first instance held that Zhao Zhihong had always confessed to the facts, and there were evidence such as witness testimony, on-site investigation transcripts, corpse appraisal opinions, on-site video identification and so on, which could confirm each other and be sufficient for confirmation. However, Zhao Zhihong intentionally killed the victim and raped the corpse, which constituted the crime of intentional homicide, not rape. At 9: 00 a.m. 15 a.m. that day, more than 80 people, including Hugue Gilletu's parents, deputies to the National People's Congress, CPPCC members, people from all walks of life and media reporters, attended the verdict. After the verdict, Zhao Zhihong said in court that he would decide whether to appeal after consideration.

At 9: 30 on February 9th, 20 15, the defendant Zhao Zhihong was publicly pronounced in the second court of Hohhot Intermediate People's Court. The Intermediate People's Court of Hohhot City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region publicly pronounced the case of the defendant Zhao Zhihong's intentional homicide, rape, robbery and theft. The court sentenced Zhao Zhihong to death for intentional homicide, rape, robbery and theft, deprived him of his political rights for life, and fined him 53,000 yuan. At the same time, Zhao Zhihong was sentenced to compensate the plaintiff in the incidental civil action for economic losses of 102768 yuan. On April 201May 14 and June 15, the second trial of Zhao Zhihong, the real murderer of "Huggieler pattern", ended, and the court did not pronounce a sentence in court.

On April 30th, 20 15, the Higher People's Court of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region publicly pronounced the case of Zhao Zhihong's intentional homicide, rape, robbery and theft, dismissed Zhao Zhihong's appeal, and upheld the criminal incidental civil judgment made by the Intermediate People's Court of Hohhot on October 26th, 20 15. The judge accepted one of the charges of attempted crime, but refused to accept Zhao Zhihong's excuses of surrender and meritorious service, and upheld the ruling of the first instance.