Criminal judgment of first instance

The following is the answer of the criminal judgment to the first instance, I hope it will help you. Criminal judgment [1998] No.X.C. 15 The public prosecution organ of the people's court of XX District of XX Province: the people's procuratorate of XX District of XX City: the defendant: Wu XX (formerly known as Wu XX), male,1July 30, 960. 1July 993 15 was criminally detained for rape. He was arrested on July 22 of the same year and is now detained in XX detention center. Defenders: Wang XX and Li XX, lawyers of XX Law Firm in Xinpu District. The People's Procuratorate of XX District of XX City filed a public prosecution against the defendant Wu XX for committing rape. On August 3rd, 65438, 0993, our hospital received the indictment from the People's Procuratorate of XX District, and formed a collegial panel according to law to hear the case in closed session. Cheng XX, the procurator of XX District People's Procuratorate, appeared in court to support the public prosecution, and the defendant Wu XX and his defenders Wang XX and Wang XX appeared in court to support the public prosecution. The case has now been closed. The People's Procuratorate of XX District accused the defendant Wu XX of raping Zhang XX on the evening of May 2 1993. Defendant Wu XX voluntarily had sex with Zhang XX for money. His defender believes that the defendant's behavior constitutes a crime, but he did not commit violence. The circumstances of the crime are relatively minor and have not caused serious consequences, and there are discretionary lenient punishment circumstances. It was found through trial that:1May 2, 19931day, the defendant Wu XX went to Dongyacen Village, Sucheng Township, XX District to sell cigarettes and stayed in the east room of his relative's house that night. That night, the defendant Wu XX went to the West Room at 0: 00 on the 22nd to rape Zhang XX, who was sleeping, after learning that her husband was fishing in the sea. The above facts were confessed by the defendant Wu XX, which was consistent with the statement of the victim Zhang XX, and were proved by the criminal science and technology appraisal [1993] X.G.W. Zi No.030 and the testimony of Xiao XX and other witnesses. The court held that the defendant, Wu XX, committed adultery while others were sleeping, which had violated the criminal law and constituted the crime of rape. The People's Procuratorate of XX District accused the defendant Wu XX of committing rape. The facts are clear and accurate, and the court supports them. Defendant Wu XX retracted his confession about the facts of his crime, arguing that the victim Zhang XX had sex with him voluntarily, which was purely a shirking of responsibility. Defender's opinion that the defendant did not commit violence and did not cause serious consequences, please handle it lightly as appropriate, and the collegial panel will consider it when sentencing.