Which is more important, reason or jurisprudence, being sued for chasing a thief and causing death?

When the two conflict particularly, I agree that jurisprudence is more important. After all, China is a country ruled by law, and everything must be governed by law. However, there is reason beyond jurisprudence, and reason is also very important. The so-called extra-legal tolerance should be properly considered when there is not such a big conflict between the two, which is also in line with China's national policy of putting people first.

Being sued does not necessarily lead to conviction. The police station decided to prosecute, which was in line with the procedure in jurisprudence. As for whether to judge by law, there is still room for discussion, which is where reason can play a role. Regarding this case, some professional lawyers have also made an analysis. It was rainy and slippery when the incident happened, which was the same for the thief and the owner. Besides, according to the surveillance video, The thief tried to break away from his master, overexerted himself, lost his balance and fell to his death. So this result is unpredictable, uncontrollable and inevitable. Huang should not bear any criminal responsibility for the thief's death. Of course, the specific punishment is ultimately decided by law.

In this case, I support not conviction. Otherwise, under the condition that the monitoring evidence is complete, they will be found innocent, and then who will dare to chase thieves and fight evil forces? When everyone is afraid to resist, will there be more people with ulterior motives to join? If so, the social order will further deteriorate.