Zhao c's related comments

Liu, a senior lawyer in Jiangxi, believes that this name right lawsuit is of great significance to improving China's civil rights system. Liu believes that the reason why "Zhao C" can use foreign letters for more than 20 years is because Zhao C's parents applied improperly or the public security department registered incorrectly. However, through this lawsuit, it also shows that China needs to remedy from the legislative aspect, and issue the Regulations on the Registration of Citizens' Names in China, or amend the Regulations on the Registration of Household Registration, so as to coordinate it with the provisions on name registration in the Law on Resident Identity Cards, and stop using foreign letters as names at the source before applying for resident identity cards.

After the ruling of the second instance, Lingyun, president of yingtan Intermediate People's Court, also analyzed that the case of Zhao C's name right has aroused great concern of many citizens in China, which will further accelerate the process of improving the law and system. Especially in the context of protecting China citizens' right to name, it will prompt the legal profession to think about how to improve various laws and regulations and standardize the use of language.

Ma, director of the Institute of Sociology of Jiangxi Academy of Social Sciences, believes that names without English letters are better, while screen names and pen names can better reflect personalized names and meet people's good wishes.

Yingtan Public Security Bureau mentioned in the reply of Yuehu Branch that the Notice of the Ministry of Public Security on Launching the New Registration Form and Household Register of Permanent Population stipulates that the registration form and household register of permanent population should be simplified by using Chinese characters published by the State Council. In this regard, Zhao believes that both the Notice and the Regulations on the Registration of Names (Draft) are just a departmental document, and they are only a draft, not even regulations, so they have no legal effect. However, the first paragraph of Article 99 of the General Principles of the Civil Law clearly stipulates: "Citizens have the right to name, have the right to decide, use and change their names according to regulations, and interference, misappropriation or forgery are prohibited."

"It is untenable to say that you are not allowed to use your name because you cannot enter the household registration management system." Lawyer Gao of Guofeng Law Firm pointed out that the household registration management system is only a running machine, and the machine should adapt to people, not people to adapt to machines. There is such a rule in jurisprudence: "The lower law shall not conflict with the upper law." Since the national law gives citizens the right to name, the relevant provisions of the Regulations on Name Registration (Draft) and the Notice are debatable, and citizens' right to name should be respected. "This case actually reflects an institutional conflict." Mao Xiaowen, vice president of Yuehu District Court, said.