This is a case of holding a person at gunpoint. In the first instance, the procuratorate prosecuted Zhang Moumou for the crimes of rape, robbery and looting committed by the defendant Zhang Moumou. Defenders believe that the defendant Zhang Moumou's behavior constitutes rape only by meeting the defendant, reading the case materials and investigating in court. The crime of rape is that he helped and cooperated with other defendants when committing rape. He belongs to the accomplice of rape and should be punished as the accomplice of rape according to law. But after all, he did not directly commit adultery with women, so he should be different from other defendants in punishment. The first instance adopted the above opinions of the defender and sentenced Zhang Moumou to life imprisonment for rape. Lawyer Guo Lianhui's defense opinion that the defendant Zhang Moumou did not constitute robbery was also adopted, and it was determined that Zhang Moumou did not constitute robbery. After the judgment of the first instance, the other two defendants who were sentenced to death in the same case refused to accept it and appealed to the Provincial Higher People's Court. After discussion by the Judicial Committee of the Provincial High Court, it was decided to send the case back for retrial. At the same time, he sent a letter to the Intermediate People's Court of Ganzhou District, ordering Zhang Moumou to be sentenced to death and executed immediately. The Intermediate People's Court of Ganzhou District executed the order of the First People's Court of the Provincial High Court, reopened the court session, sentenced Zhang Moumou to death for rape and deprived him of political rights for life. Zhang Moumou refused to accept the appeal. Lawyer Guo Lianhui went to Beijing with all the files and reported the case to the Supreme People's Court. Lawyer Guo Lianhui's opinion was supported by the Supreme People's Court. The Supreme Court telephoned the Jiangxi Provincial High Court and sentenced Zhang Moumou to death with a two-year suspension, just to see what would happen later. In the appeal trial remanded for retrial, Jiangxi Higher People's Court carried out the Supreme People's Court's instructions and sentenced Zhang Moumou to death for rape, with a two-year reprieve, just to see what would happen later. Lawyer Guo Lianhui's defense and conscientious professionalism saved a life.
In another intentional homicide case defended by Guo Lianhui, when meeting with the criminal suspect Hou Moumou, Hou denied using rat poison to kill Peng Moumou, arguing that he was innocent and was forced to plead guilty. He claimed to have been detained in the Criminal Investigation Brigade for four days and four nights after reporting the case, and was interrogated and beaten in turn. He took off his clothes and trousers in front of the policemen accompanied by the Criminal Investigation Brigade, and did see a large area of bruises on both sides of his thighs, with an area of about 14X 16cm. In view of this, lawyer Guo Lianhui wrote a report to a county public security bureau the next day on the request to examine the suspect Hou Moumou. In the stage of examination and prosecution, lawyer Guo Lianhui submitted a medical record of Peng Moumou's hospitalization on August 9, 1996 to the Public Prosecution Office of Ganzhou People's Procuratorate, which proved that Peng Moumou committed suicide by buying rat poison and died after being rescued. In view of this, lawyer Guo Lianhui believes that there is insufficient evidence to determine that Hou Moumou deliberately poisoned and killed Peng Moumou. Although Hou Moumou admitted to poisoning Peng Moumou with rat poison under torture, he was called to retract his confession as soon as he entered the detention center. Lawyer Guo Lianhui believes that the source of the confession is illegal and cannot be used as the basis for determining the facts of the case. The public security organs have not collected strong evidence to prove that Hou Moumou poisoned Peng Moumou with rat poison. In the stage of examination and prosecution, the defender has always expressed the above opinions to the procuratorial organs, arguing that the evidence in this case is insufficient and the charges are difficult to be established, and the principle of never suspecting a crime should be implemented. In the end, the procuratorate adopted the defender's opinion, made a decision not to prosecute Hou Moumou, and released Hou Moumou. Lawyer Guo Lianhui's defense effectively safeguarded Hou's personal rights.