What is the concept of court debate?

Legal analysis: court debate refers to the litigation activities in which the parties and their agents ad litem or defenders clarify their opinions on the facts and evidence of the case and refute the opinions of the other party during the trial. The court debate stage is an important stage of the trial procedure, and its main task is to organize the parties to put forward their opinions on the facts and evidence investigated by the court, so as to help the people's court find out the facts and distinguish right from wrong.

Legal basis: provisions on the protection of lawyers' practice rights according to law.

Thirtieth in the process of court hearing, lawyers can debate the facts, evidence and applicable laws of the case in court.

Article 31 A judge should pay attention to the equality of litigation rights and the balance between prosecution and defense during the trial. The contents, methods and time of lawyers' questioning, cross-examination and debate shall be fairly guaranteed by the court according to law, so that lawyers can fully express their opinions and find out the facts of the case.

During the trial, the judge can guide the lawyer's questions and debates. The judge shall not interrupt or stop the lawyer's speech at will according to the procedure, except that the content of the speech is too repetitive, the relevant issues have been agreed at the pre-trial meeting, it is irrelevant to the case, or it insults, slanders, threatens others, and deliberately disrupts the court order.

Article 417 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Procuratorate: In the course of court trial, with the permission of the presiding judge, the public prosecutor may express his opinions on the evidence and the case under investigation one by one and argue with the defendant and defender. After the investigation of evidence is completed, the public prosecutor shall make concluding comments.

In the court debate, if the public prosecutor disagrees with the opinions of the victim and the agent ad litem, the public prosecutor should listen carefully to the opinions of the victim and the agent ad litem and clarify his opinions and reasons.