First, understand the reasons for not filing a case.
First of all, the accuser should know in detail the specific reasons why the public security organ refuses to file a case. This will help the plaintiff to judge more accurately whether it is necessary to conduct an examination and prepare the examination materials accordingly.
Second, apply for review.
If the complainant thinks that the decision of the public security organ not to file a case is wrong, he may apply to the public security organ that made the decision for review. When applying for review, a written application and relevant evidential materials shall be submitted. The written application shall clearly explain the reasons and basis for the review, so that the public security organ can conduct the review.
Third, wait for the results of the review.
After receiving the complainant's application for reexamination, the public security organ will conduct reexamination according to legal procedures. The complainant needs to wait patiently for the results of the review, during which he can keep in touch with the public security organs to understand the progress of the review.
Fourth, accept the review decision.
After examination, the public security organ will make a decision to maintain the original decision or cancel the original decision and file a case. The complainant shall respect and accept the reexamination decision of the public security organ. If you still have objections, you can seek relief through other channels, such as appealing to the public security organ at a higher level or bringing a private prosecution to the people's court.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) protects rights according to law
In the whole review process, the accuser shall safeguard his rights according to law, and shall not take excessive actions or interfere with the normal work order of the public security organs. At the same time, the plaintiff can also seek legal aid or consult a lawyer in order to better safeguard his legitimate rights and interests.
To sum up:
The handling method of criminal non-filing review requires the accuser to understand the reasons for not filing a case, file an application for review, wait for the review result, accept the review decision, and safeguard rights according to law. In the whole process, the accuser should follow legal procedures, respect the decisions of public security organs and actively safeguard his legitimate rights and interests.
Legal basis:
Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China
Article 1 12 stipulates:
The people's court, the people's procuratorate or the public security organ shall, within the jurisdiction, timely review the materials of accusation, complaint, report and surrender, and if it is considered that there are criminal facts that need to be investigated for criminal responsibility, it shall file a case; If it is considered that there are no criminal facts, or the criminal facts are obviously minor, and it is not necessary to pursue criminal responsibility, the case shall not be filed, and the complainant shall be informed of the reasons for not filing the case. If the complainant refuses to accept it, he may apply for reconsideration.
Procedures for handling criminal cases by public security organs
Article 176 stipulates:
If the complainant refuses to accept the decision not to file a case, he may apply for reconsideration to the public security organ that made the decision within seven days after receiving the notice of not filing a case; The public security organ shall make a decision within 30 days after receiving the complainant's application for reconsideration, and notify the complainant in writing.