1, the destination of network behavior.
Network behavior must have a purpose. Therefore, the purpose of the behavior can be used as a connection point to determine jurisdiction. If the actor makes the information and data available to a specific person on the network, and wants others to visit the webpage, or intentionally sends the information and data to a specific target, this proactive contact purpose is directly and intentionally related to the location of the target. This direct intentional connection can be presumed that the actor's expression of will is to accept the law of the target place, which constitutes the basis of the jurisdiction of the court in the target place.
2. The place where cyber crimes occur.
Cybercrime must be carried out through certain computer equipment, with the actor as the center and the equipment for committing the crime as the clue to determine the location of the crime. The computer terminals, servers and other equipment where the perpetrator commits cyber crimes are relatively fixed, so the location of the server, computer terminals and other equipment where the perpetrator commits cyber crimes can be regarded as the location where the crime is committed.
3. The result of cyber crime.
Due to the global nature of network communication, any online behavior will affect countless places. If this is the basis of jurisdiction, it will inevitably lead to the proliferation of competent courts. However, cyber crimes such as infringement of business secrets, espionage, network intrusion, spreading destructive viruses, logic bombs, placing backdoor programs, peeping, copying, changing or deleting computer information are of a * * nature, that is, they must invade other people's computer information networks to commit crimes. Therefore, if the location of the invaded system LAN, computer terminal and other equipment is regarded as a criminal result, there is no objection that the local court has jurisdiction.