Case review and rectification report
First, leaders attach importance to it and are well organized. In strict accordance with the guiding ideology, scope, key points, methods and steps and specific requirements of law enforcement inspection, every step of self-inspection work has been carefully arranged, implemented, supervised and inspected.
Second, grasp the key points and conduct strict self-examination.
In order to ensure the strict standardization of environmental protection administrative law enforcement documents, our bureau has arranged and deployed a special topic on the evaluation of environmental protection administrative law enforcement documents. From July/KOOC-0/0 to June/KOOC-0/5, 2065438, a five-day self-inspection and self-evaluation activity was organized in the Environmental Monitoring Brigade, and the brigade was required to carry out a self-inspection and self-evaluation activity from 20/KOOC-0/3 to 20/KOOC-0/4. On this basis, all law enforcement documents were strictly examined from the aspects of entity, procedure, documents and case file binding. After self-examination, the administrative law enforcement files of our bureau are strictly standardized, with complete format and text, complete content and materials, orderly arrangement and neat binding. The facts are basically clear, the evidence is legal and valid, and the administrative punishment and licensing procedures are legal and standardized.
All the files show that there have been no misjudged administrative cases and no administrative reconsideration cases in the administrative law enforcement cases handled by our bureau. The concrete manifestations are: the subject of law enforcement is legal; There is no situation beyond the statutory authority; Whether the applicable legal basis is correct; Law enforcement procedures are legal; Clearly identify the facts; Appropriate discretion; Can fully protect the right of participation, statement, defend oneself and relief of the counterpart, especially if the specific administrative act may adversely affect the rights and obligations of the counterpart, can correctly inform the right to apply for administrative reconsideration, the administrative reconsideration organ and the application period; There are no cases beyond the statutory time limit; Code for making administrative law enforcement files.
Third, standardize file management and promote administration according to law.
All along, according to the requirements of one case and one volume, our bureau has sorted out and improved all the administrative punishment files, especially the administrative collection of sewage charges, administrative licensing, administrative compulsory entry, administrative reconsideration and other files. Our bureau attaches great importance to it, and makes clear the special person to ensure that all files are filed in accordance with the relevant legal procedures of administrative punishment and collection, which also provides a strong basis for strict law enforcement next year.
Fourth, the existing problems and corrective measures
Although our bureau has made remarkable achievements in the work of administrative punishment files last year, there are still many shortcomings and problems compared with the requirements of superiors and advanced units. For example, when individual law enforcement officers handle cases, their records are scribbled and their terms are not standardized; Only pay attention to the practice of handling cases, ignoring theoretical study and experience summary, so that the case can not be done and the experience can not be obtained; It is rare that the files are not in place. In view of these shortcomings and problems, in the second half of the year, our bureau will focus on solving them from the following convenience aspects.
First, increase business training, focusing on document making training, improve the ability and level of law enforcement personnel to make legal documents, investigate and collect evidence, improve the level and ability of law enforcement personnel in administrative law enforcement, improve the efficiency of administrative law enforcement, and ensure the legitimacy and standardization of administrative law enforcement.
The second is to hold regular and irregular experience summary exchange meetings, so that all cadres and workers can sum up their own experiences and practices and learn from each other's strengths in light of their own handling process.
The third is to further improve the level of file management, strict file filing system, file binding in line with standards, unified norms.
Article 2 Case evaluation and rectification report
According to the deployment of the District High Court and Yulin Intermediate People's Court, xx Court earnestly carried out the "Looking Back" activity of "One Million Cases" quality evaluation, carefully analyzed the existing problems, implemented rectification measures, and strived to improve the quality and efficiency of cases. The first is to hold an analysis meeting and seriously investigate the problems. Timely feedback on the evaluation of the District High Court and Yulin Intermediate People's Court. The person in charge of the relevant court room seriously discussed the evaluation results, deeply analyzed the reasons for the quality problems in the case and summed up the experience. Through analysis and summary, every police officer deeply realizes the value of details, enhances the awareness of details, practices the concept of details, carefully examines the shortcomings in trial and execution, completes every detail, link and node, and constantly improves the overall level of trial work.
The second is to formulate rectification plans and implement rectification measures. The two-level courts evaluated 100 cases in our hospital, and pointed out that there were seven problems: the evaluation was relatively simple, and the opinions of the presiding judge should prevail; The case numbers are inconsistent; In some cases, the evidence submitted by the parties does not show that this document is the same as the original; The binding order of cases is not uniform; Ordinary procedure civil and commercial cases are not divided into positive and negative volumes; The judgment text of individual cases is inaccurate; There is no judgment on confiscation of drug money and criminal tools in individual cases. In view of the existing problems, according to the requirements of the rectification of Yulin Intermediate People's Court, the court corrected and filled them from the aspects of substantive judgment, trial procedure, legal application, collegiate panel review, legal documents and case file binding, standardized the determination of case number and cause of action, improved the submission of case information, improved the deficiency of review and judgment, and prevented and eliminated the recurrence of similar problems. Cases after rectification will be reviewed and strictly checked by the case jury of our hospital, and cases that do not meet the requirements will be returned to the relevant business court for rectification until they meet the requirements.
The third is comprehensive rectification to ensure effective results. Rectify the backlog of complaint letters and visits, actively resolve contradictions and disputes according to the measures and suggestions of the analysis report, do a good job in serving judgments and appeals, and use various social forces to promote the resolution of social contradictions and truly realize the closure of cases. Rectify the special evaluation cases, formulate guiding opinions on the general problems in the trial process, focus on solving the problems existing in the application of different legal judgments in similar cases, and strictly implement them in accordance with the guiding opinions of the District High Court and the unified standards and scales of judgment. Rectify the development and reform cases, organize relevant judges to summarize the reasons for the development and reform of cases, analyze the problems existing in the quality of cases, and formulate countermeasures to minimize the development and reform of cases caused by quality problems.
Article 3 Case evaluation and rectification report
According to the requirements of the Political and Legal Committee of Deyang Municipal Committee and the Provincial Department of Justice on carrying out 20 1 1 case evaluation activities, the Party Committee of our bureau attached great importance to it, made careful arrangements, paid close attention to implementation, and promoted the evaluation work in an orderly manner. First of all, leaders value and understand unity.
Administrative law enforcement files are records of administrative law enforcement cases, reflecting the quality of law enforcement cases and the quality of law enforcement personnel, and reflecting the level of government administration according to law; The problems existing in law enforcement archives are the concentrated reflection of the problems existing in case handling quality, law enforcement team, law enforcement system and law enforcement level. The leaders of our bureau attach great importance to it, and regard case evaluation as a "breakthrough" and three key tasks to comprehensively promote administration according to law. All law enforcement departments also fully realize that case evaluation is the basic work to resolve social contradictions and disputes, promote fair and honest law enforcement, an important measure to solve law enforcement problems, strengthen law enforcement supervision and improve law enforcement quality, and a concrete action to practice law enforcement for the people and safeguard social fairness and justice; It is the core work of implementing the "Implementation Outline of Comprehensively Promoting Administration by Law in the State Council" and the "Decision of the State Council on Strengthening Administration by Law of City and County Governments"; It is also an effective measure to improve legal supervision and an effective means to promote administrative law enforcement organs to improve the level of administration according to law. To grasp administration according to law, we must grasp the evaluation of files and comprehensively promote administration according to law and fair and honest law enforcement.
Second, improve the organization and make careful arrangements.
According to the spirit of the document "Implementation Opinions on Carrying out Case Evaluation Activities in 20 1 1 year" by the Political and Legal Committee of the Municipal Party Committee (German Law [2011] No.2), our bureau timely adjusted the members of the case evaluation leading group according to the change of leadership division of labor, with Comrade Xiong as the deputy head. At the same time, we will deploy specialized personnel to form an evaluation team. At the same time, according to the requirements of the Political and Legal Committee this year, the content and time of the evaluation were carefully arranged. The time schedule is from the end of February to June 30th to complete the self-examination and review of the Bureau. The evaluation is mainly divided into three stages. The first stage is self-examination and self-correction, reporting the situation; The second stage focuses on spot checks and cross-checks. The third stage is case analysis and centralized evaluation; In order to sum up the rectification.
Third, focus and be practical.
Our evaluation of law enforcement cases this time includes administrative license files and legal aid cases handled from June 2065438 to February 2065438. Combined with the actual work of our bureau, we will determine the focus of this year's evaluation. In terms of the types of cases, the administrative licensing items of our bureau last year were relatively simple, only the licensing items of lawyers and law firms. Therefore, according to the actual situation of our work, we only randomly selected two permitted cases. This year's law enforcement case evaluation focused on the evaluation of legal aid cases, and randomly selected two civil and 1 criminal legal aid files, trying to improve the quality of legal aid cases and standardize the procedures and documents of legal aid work through case evaluation. At the same time, in the evaluation content, we should focus on checking the implementation of rectification of problems found in the previous year's evaluation and the implementation of evaluation standards and systems. At the same time, it is necessary to find out the defects in the evaluation standards and systems through evaluation, so as to improve the systems and standards.
Fourth, strict standards and objective evaluation.
This time, our bureau still insists on unified standards. According to the Evaluation Standard for Administrative License Files and the Evaluation Standard for the Quality of Legal Aid Cases in Deyang City formulated by the Municipal Bureau last year, it is evaluated from five aspects: first, whether the handling procedures are legal, whether the filing, investigation and evidence collection, handling procedures and legal documents are complete, whether they are implemented according to the prescribed procedures, and whether they are overdue; The second is to see whether the facts are clear and whether the evidence is true and sufficient; The third is to see whether the applicable law is correct and whether the implementation is fair and just; The fourth is to see whether the legal documents are standardized and complete, and whether the terms are standardized, accurate and detailed; The fifth is to look at the reflection of the parties and whether the social effect is good. Make an objective and fair analysis of the quality of the case and form a case self-inspection report. Then the evaluation team of the municipal bureau will conduct centralized evaluation. The evaluation mainly introduces the basic situation of the case and self-evaluation of the case through the case handlers. The evaluation team evaluates the case according to relevant laws and evaluation standards, forms an evaluation conclusion through collective discussion, and confirms the social effect of case handling through a return visit to the parties.
Fifth, the evaluation results are objective and true.
The results of careful examination of five evaluation cases by the case evaluation team of the municipal bureau are: excellent in 5 cases and good 1 case. The qualified rate is 100%, and there are no misjudged cases or defective cases.
The law enforcement subject of administrative licensing cases is appropriate, the application materials are complete, the procedures are legal, the filing is standardized, and the licensee is satisfied. Problems such as not receiving the acceptance notice and not receiving the license have been corrected. There are some minor defects, such as time printing errors in some documents and no fingerprints in the amendment.
The application and acceptance of legal aid cases comply with the law and the materials are complete; Legal aid personnel perform their duties according to law, and the procedures are legal; Complete collection of evidence materials; The opinions of the authorities were adopted and the case was satisfactorily resolved; In the process of handling the case, the rescuers did not collect the property of the parties and other acts that violated the lawyer's professional ethics and practice discipline; The handling of the case has achieved good legal and social effects. By handling legal aid cases, recipients know how to use legal means to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, rather than through illegal petitions, picking fights and other means. Legal aid is an effective way for vulnerable groups to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. Last year, there were problems such as no written record of the conversation with the parties, simple content of the closing report, and the format file to be improved, which were obviously improved. Existing problems: the individual law enforcement documents in the legal aid files are not standardized, and there is no uniform format and paper for the Inquiry Record, so the filing of the files needs to be further strengthened.
Summarizing the evaluation of administrative law enforcement cases in 20 1 1, it is found that through the evaluation of law enforcement cases, the basic situation is clarified, the law enforcement experience is summarized, the problems that need to be rectified are found out, and the focus of future work is clarified. The evaluation results show that all administrative law enforcement departments pay more attention to administration according to law, and their awareness of administrative responsibility according to law is obviously strengthened. The level of handling cases has been improved, the law enforcement behavior has been continuously standardized, and the quality of law enforcement has been continuously improved. The quality of cases has improved significantly. It can be seen that with the continuous strengthening of administrative law enforcement training and supervision, the handling level of administrative law enforcement personnel has been greatly improved compared with the past. The vast majority of files have clear facts, accurate applicable laws, conclusive evidence and legal enforcement procedures. The comprehensive evaluation of handling procedures, evidence investigation, handling technology, document making, file filing, system construction and file quality has been improved.