Identification cannot prove who caused it. Even if we don't prove that it was you, we can't sue you.
Mild injuries: refers to injuries to a person's limbs or appearance, partial damage to hearing, vision or other organ functions, or other injuries that cause moderate harm to personal health, including minor injuries level one and minor injuries level two. class.
Principles of identification: Follow the principle of seeking truth from facts, insist on comprehensive analysis and comprehensive identification based on the primary injury directly caused by the factors causing human injury and the complications or sequelae caused by the injury. For the identification based on the primary injury and its complications, the identification should be based on the injury situation at the time of the injury, supplemented by the consequences of the injury, and conduct a comprehensive identification. For injuries or tissue or organ dysfunction as the basis for identification, the identification should be based on the consequences of the injury, supplemented by the time of the injury, and comprehensive identification.
Identification timing: The primary injury is the main basis for identification, and identification can be made after the injury; the complications caused by the injury are the main identification basis, and identification can be made after the injury is stable.
The main basis for identification is the occurrence of injury or tissue or organ dysfunction, and the identification is carried out 90 days after the injury; under special circumstances, an identification opinion can be issued based on the primary injury and its complications, but for possible The sequelae should be explained, and if necessary, they should be reviewed and supplemented with additional identification.
Difficult and complex injuries should be identified after clinical treatment is completed or the injury is stable.
Reference answer:
Half a month after a personal injury case occurred, the hospital's third examination of the injured found a new symptom - splenic rupture, and the injured was hospitalized. It was determined that the injury constituted Level 2 serious injury, and the case entered the criminal investigation process. The complexity of this case is that the victim's spleen ruptured 15 days before the incident. Wasn't it caused by injuries at that time? The case occurred in Anren County, Hunan Province. Two people have been sentenced by the court for intentional injury. Hou Xinhua, who was accused of being the mastermind behind the case, appeared in court in Anren County Court for trial recently.
During the trial, there was a fierce exchange between the prosecution and the defense: the prosecutor believed that Hou Xinhua instructed others to intentionally injure others and should be held criminally responsible for the crime of intentional injury; the defense lawyer questioned the cause of the serious injury and believed that the relevant evidence could not It was proved that serious injuries were caused in this case.
Hou Xinhua and his defense lawyer applied for re-evaluation of the cause of the victim’s serious injuries. During the court hearing on May 3, the collegial panel reviewed and approved the application, and the judicial technical department of the court contacted for re-evaluation.