In cross-examination, we should first express our opinions closely around the legality, authenticity and relevance of the evidence. Listen carefully to the defendant's cross-examination opinions, complement each other and fill in the blanks. The defendant's own cross-examination opinions may provide lawyers with new ideas, and lawyers can rearrange the defendant's opinions and publish them. Lawyers should express cross-examination opinions in French, with concise language, legal basis, clear hierarchy, clear logic and clear organization. During the cross-examination, you can respond in time according to the investigation of the trial and incorporate the cross-examination opinions. Cross-examination requires some common sense of life, and the testimony that violates common sense, common sense and common sense is untrue and cannot be used as the basis for finalizing the case. In cross-examination, it is necessary to master the rules of evidence and use them flexibly, including the rules of illegal evidence exclusion, repeated confession, opinion evidence and limited hearsay evidence. Be good at combining other evidence for comprehensive cross-examination.
legal ground
Article 59 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the people's procuratorate shall prove the legality of evidence collection in the process of court investigation. If the existing evidence materials cannot prove the legality of evidence collection, the people's procuratorate may request the people's court to notify the relevant investigators or other personnel to appear in court to explain the situation; The people's court may notify the relevant investigators or other personnel to appear in court to explain the situation. Relevant investigators or other personnel may also request to appear in court to explain the situation. Upon notification by the people's court, the relevant personnel shall appear in court.