Answer/reply summary
Respondent: name XXX, male, born in, nationality:, migrant worker, address:
The respondent's name XXX v the respondent's name XXX and the real estate dispute, and the defense is as follows:
1. The name of the respondent XXX and the name of the respondent XXX used to be husband and wife, but now they exist in name only. Throughout the marriage,
Respondents basically refused to have sex with the respondent's name XXX (fill in your father's name). Occasionally, the respondent did it against his will, and didn't take (fill in your father's name) as a husband at all.
Both parties have separated, and the respondent lives alone (fill in stepmother's address) and (fill in father's address). Respondents go to respondents to live together, which is a kind of life.
The feeling of being forced to go whoring is only money trading, without emotional exchange and communication, and always in a hurry. Married for more than ten years, living together for no more than two months.
2. During the marriage relationship with the respondent, the respondent never gave money for family expenses (fill in your father's name). Both sides have always been AA, and each side has its own expenses.
Third, the respondent (fill in your son's name) was not born by the respondent, so the respondent has been ignoring, turning a blind eye to (fill in your son's name), which is very indifferent. It's chilling.
Really should be a folk slang: ten stepmother and nine evils. Based on the above three points, will the respondent give money to the respondent to build a house (fill in your current house address)? Are you out of your mind?
This kind of thing is harder than streaking to the sky. The respondent knows that he has built a house in (fill in his father's address) and will not come back to live and live. She is tired of (filling in her father's address) and wants to take money back to build a house?
The respondent is simply dreaming.
In view of the above three points, the respondent (fill in your son's name) is so desperate that he can't expect his father to guarantee his daily life in the future, let alone the respondent to give him even a little support and help.
We can only rely on relatives such as mother, menstruation and menstruation to borrow money to build another shelter. Although (fill in your son's name) was in high school when the house was built, (fill in your son's name) relatives already knew.
The respondent's indifference and his father's helplessness forced him to rely on his relatives to build his own house for a rainy day, so as not to be driven away by the respondent.
At that time, if (fill in your son's name) did not have financial ability, did you not let your relatives and mothers have financial ability? Is it necessary for the stepmother to deprive the respondent (fill in your son's name) of any material love from his biological mother and relatives? )
5. It's nonsense for the respondents to say that they will set up a building when they settle down. There are also building, payment, registration and so on. It's all taken care of (fill in your father's name), and it's not all wrong. This is a kind of civil agency,
As a legal worker, the respondents don't understand! Is it cheating the world? Or a wave of fame? Idiot reincarnation?
The respondent mentioned that the respondent (fill in your son's name) had gone to work in Zhejiang on the day when he entered the new house in a four-story building, which was simply nonsense. This four-story building has not yet entered the fire.
The defendant doesn't even know the most crucial thing, that is, perjury. The defendant gave false testimony for a legal worker, which was simply a slap in the face.
Seven, the respondent said that the respondent (fill in your father's name) used his power to commit perjury, perjury, deliberately concealing and transferring the property of husband and wife, which was purely false accusation and frame-up, and the respondent reserved the right to sue him for the crime of false accusation and frame-up.
Eight, the respondent's appeal against the house has been recognized by the court for three times, and they all think that the house does not belong to the same property of the respondent (fill in your father's name) and the respondent (fill in the stepmother's name) and rejected it.
Now Nong Yongxin appeals for this house again, and he also needs to provide any evidence. It is an abuse of the right to appeal, unreasonable litigation, and unreasonable troubles. It has given the people's court a precious price with the ultra-low-cost litigation right given by law.
Trial resources and the defendant's precious time and energy. The respondent requested the court to dismiss his lawsuit, impose a fine on him and compensate the respondent for the loss of responding to the lawsuit.
I am here to convey
Pingnan county people's court
Respondents:
Respondents:
20 10 April XX