Court debate is in the courtroom under the presiding judge, by both sides of the lawsuit according to the law and the facts, on the key issues of the case and how to apply the law, make a fair decision and so on, face to face, directly to the discussion, argument and rebuttal of a kind of judicial expression of the spoken word. The next small editor for you to organize the lawyer court debate skills and considerations, I hope to help you. Lawyer court debate skills ① good at taking the initiative. Strive for the initiative is the key to win the debate. There are two skills: one is good at debating the topic, is to envision for the other side may want to debate the topic, the topic is generally in the facts, evidence, qualitative, sentencing, applicable legal provisions, procedures and so on six aspects of consideration, good at setting up the topic is the first to take the initiative. Second, good at striking, that is, in the articulation of their own views at the same time, keen to find the other side of the loopholes and errors, seize the crux of the attack, so that the other side is passive. ② good at the beginning of the word good. Common methods are three: one is to borrow other people's mouth, such as borrowing the mouth of the trial staff, the mouth of the defendant, with their words, with a court investigation of a plot as the beginning of the debate, and then start the debate. The second is to put forward a key issue for the other party to reply, so that the other party's errors and omissions exposed clearly, and then as a target to carry out the debate. The third is to open the door to the crux of the debate to begin with, that is, the basic insights of the other side, a straightforward rebuttal. ③ good use of first-hand materials. The debaters should be good at their own in the process of handling the case with their own eyes and ears, and after repeated verification of the facts and evidence, said clear, understandable, specific, including important details. Because the material is solid, the potential is great, so that people have a strong sense of conviction, especially favorable to the debate to win. ④ Good citation of legal provisions. Requirements of the debaters not only on each legal preamble code to say, but also on each article in the first few paragraphs, the first few items should also be memorized, and to grasp the inner letter and substance, as well as with the relevant provisions of the intrinsic connection, and then clarify the relationship between these provisions and the facts of the case is accurate and unambiguous. To do these points, you can be in the debate in a clear and easy, it is easier to turn "danger" into safety, turn "defeat" into victory. ⑤ Good at finding the "target". To listen carefully to the other side of the speech, good at catching the other side of a paragraph of the main idea, to catch the loopholes in this paragraph, to catch this paragraph and his previous words, and the words of the witnesses, and the words of the victim of the contradiction. This will be able to find the "target", tit-for-tat with his own spear, attacking his own shield, so that the other side to lose the debate of the sharpness and initiative, to receive a more satisfactory debate effect. (6) good at rejecting redundant debate. In the debate, such as the other side in the branch on the issue of holding on to the situation or dead, you can take the practice of refusing to debate: such as the other side entangled in the issue has been elucidated, only need to point out that has been spoken in front of no longer repeat; if the other side of holding on to the branch, you can point out that: "the issue raised does not affect the case of the characterization of the sentencing "; if the defendant in front of clear facts and evidence to determine the death of denial, lawyers can no longer be defended at the appropriate time, the prosecutor can state that the prosecutor's statement to the end, so that the debate stops, dry and powerful. (7) good at this and that. When the other side of a one-time more questions and each question is related to qualitative sentencing, the debaters are only appropriate to answer the focus of each question, do not elaborate, in order to leave themselves room for thought; the other side if one or two questions, and then on the one or two questions for specific answers; if the other side of the question a lot of critical only one or two, only one or two questions can be answered, the statement of the other questions "Do not answer for the time being", it is not appropriate to speak the words to death; if it is a criminal case, a number of defendants have their own defenders, the defenders of the defense statement, not to another defender of the defendant's head to push the culpability, it is not appropriate to appear in the court of the defenders of the dispute between the defendant to focus on the facts of the defendant's defense. (8) good at remedying mistakes. Court debate is serious, as far as possible, do not say inappropriate words, do not say that should not say the wrong words, but, after all, misspeaking, the phenomenon of speaking the wrong words can not be completely avoided. Encountered this situation, the following methods can be taken to remedy: First, the non-fundamental inappropriate words that have been uttered, can be said in the next round of speeches to be more thorough, can also be made in the adjournment of the court to the other side of the explanation; Secondly, said a direct impact on the conviction and sentencing of the wrong words, it must be immediately corrected, you can say: "Presiding Judge, please allow me to be more complete and more accurate statement of the statement I just made! ......" This is the court admits fault in a euphemistic way, the other party does not have to go back to the entanglement; Third, said the words should not be said, such as insulting each other's personality words, should be converted as soon as possible to make up for the tone of voice, try to make up for it, and take the initiative to the other party to make amends to the other party to apologize for the court hearing. ⑨ good at relaxing emotions. Experienced debaters are good at controlling emotions with reason, and always keep the emotions of relaxation, and tension on the debate is extremely unfavorable. How to relax? First of all to do not be angry by the other side of the rhetoric, the mood from beginning to end to relax; Secondly, we must adhere to the moderate speed of speech, to the speed of speech to inhibit the excitement of the third to say clear in the speech in the serial number, resulting in the appropriate language gap, can make the words clear, but also to control the emotions.
Lawyers court debate notes: court debate on the maintenance of a party to oral expression, avoid the following 15 practices: 1 taboo agitation and incitement; 2 taboo into a political report or academic report; 3 taboo is not familiar - the case is not familiar with the legal provisions of the law is not familiar with the method of expression of the judicial oral expression is not familiar with the 4 taboo defender into the defendant "role"; 5 taboo no words to find words to defend; 6 taboo grasping pigtails, hats, sticks; 7 taboo irony and sarcasm each other 8 taboo use of prose rhetorical devices to organize speech; 9 taboo will be the private details, confidential materials to poke out; 10 taboo arbitrarily for the defendant to ask for credit for the good; 11 taboo repeating the defendant's swear words, black words; 12 (12) taboo known not to say, Newly known poor; do not know the nonsense; 13 taboo hand-wringing; 14 taboo pointed voice called or mosquito-like only buzzing sound; 15 taboo against the law, regardless of the fact of sophistry or sophistry.