The design of modern judicial procedure is the combination of power restriction and right restriction, but as a typical form of administrative justice, the task force completes the trial of cases in a unilateral, secret and super-authoritative form. Third, it is a kind of ultra vires trial. The ultra-authority of the task force has two meanings. On the one hand, it means that it is essentially a self-trial, which violates the requirements of judicial prosecution and defense. Some people will say that the task force is only the preliminary investigation and coordination guidance for the public security organs, and the final prosecution and trial of the case are completed by the public security organs in accordance with legal procedures. The problem is that many unjust cases are coordinated and guided by the task force. In fact, it is the leading body above the public security law and the actual case handler. The procedure followed by the public security inspection law is only a form. On the other hand, it means that without legal procedures, it often takes many unconventional extra-legal measures, extorts confessions by torture and detains them for an extended period. Therefore, from the perspective of citizens' right to participate, the task force lacks the legal form of citizens' participation in justice.
In addition to the characteristics of the above-mentioned trial methods, the task force also has problems after the judgment: once there is a wrong case, no one is responsible. The task force is a collective. After making a big mistake, anyone can masturbate under the guise of collective responsibility. "Organization" is a force that many people in China think they can rely on. Many times, we also get a sense of security and belonging from it. However, this is a terrible term, and everyone can use it to wash the blood off their hands when killing people.
The task force relies on the feudal inquisitorial or extremely authoritarian model to solve the problem. Therefore, in the process of correcting the She Xianglin case, Pan Yujun's suicide, as a sequel to the tragedy, is reasonable and unexpected. There is no clear conclusion about the Pan case, but judging from the cases handled by the task force, only one thing is certain: the members of the task force were being tried by the task force at that time, which violated the procedures of the Criminal Procedure Law. We can't say why he committed suicide, but there is no doubt that the process was not open, the lawyer did not participate in the investigation of the task force, and he was treated unfairly in procedure.