Lawyer Wang Snake, as a criminal defense lawyer, because of his own growth experience, has given him an extra layer of filtering to those who have committed serious crimes. He believes in democracy and justice of law. He has some empathy for these people and knows that not everyone has a warm life.
A miserable childhood may lead to violence in adulthood, and these felonies may not be the culprit at the root, but the people, events or moments that made him who he is now. He seems to be a machine without any emotion, and he can defend his defenders rationally. Both Li Xiaoming and Chen Chang are actively running, hoping to understand the reasons that led to him and take precautions. In his view, only punishment does not stop the tragedy from happening. But does such a rational and ideal person really exist in reality? I can understand that he, as a human rights defender, strives for the rights he has for every independent person. Whether he will live or die in the end, and what kind of punishment he will receive, he will be judged by law. But I also think that this idea is too simple, and individuals cannot accept that murderers are exempt from the death penalty for mental reasons. Even if there are spiritual reasons, the subject of the crime is the person himself, so it is very unfair to the victim's family, and such criminals will eventually be released into society, which is potentially harmful to society. If you commit another crime, who will bear the losses?
There is nothing wrong with lawyers from the perspective of human rights, but our judiciary needs to formulate more perfect laws for such cases with gray areas in order to achieve a balance between the two sides.