1. Can people from the Justice Bureau interfere with the court's decision?
Public security organs are responsible for daily social security and management. Due to the off-duty and working characteristics of public security organs, it is inevitable for public security organs to intervene in civil disputes, and it is also a traditional habit and a realistic need of social development for judicial organs not to intervene in civil disputes. Public security organs have limited involvement in civil disputes and handle contradictions according to law, which has irreplaceable advantages and functions for other organs. However, for a long time, the public security organs have been caught in a dilemma when they intervene in civil disputes: if they advance, they may intervene improperly or exceed their authority, which will be considered as inaction and unable to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. Whether and how the public security organs can intervene in civil disputes has become the focus of attention from all walks of life. It is very important for public security organs to perform their duties and intervene in civil disputes in a limited way.
Second, will the court make a fair judgment?
The court should make a fair judgment.
The defendant has an acquaintance who works in the court. As a plaintiff, you can apply for withdrawal.
Article 44 A judge shall recuse himself in any of the following circumstances, and the parties have the right to apply for recusal orally or in writing.
Avoid:
(1) Being a party to the case or a close relative of a party or agent ad litem;
(2) Having an interest in the case;
(3) Having other relations with the parties or agents ad litem in this case, which may affect the fair trial of the case.
If a judge accepts a banquet hosted by a party or agent ad litem or meets with a party or agent ad litem in violation of regulations, the party has the right to refuse.
Ask them to avoid.
If a judge commits the acts listed in the preceding paragraph, he shall be investigated for legal responsibility according to law.
I hope the above content can help you. Please consult a professional lawyer if you have any other questions.
Legal basis: "Measures for the Implementation of Community Correction" Article 4 People's courts, people's procuratorates, public security organs and prisons may entrust county-level judicial administrative organs to conduct impact investigation and evaluation on defendants and criminals who intend to apply community correction. The entrusted judicial administrative organ shall, according to the requirements of the entrusting organ, investigate and understand the residence, family and social relations, consistent performance, consequences and influence of criminal acts, opinions of village (neighborhood) committees and victims, and prohibited matters of the defendant or criminal, form an evaluation opinion, and submit it to the entrusting organ in time.