When the "network resources" can't play a role, "local lawyers" no longer have the "home advantage", and these cases are more beneficial to foreign lawyers. At this time, "network resources" can easily become "burden". For example, a leader interferes with a lawyer's defense strategy, and an organ exerts pressure through a bar association or a judicial bureau.
Major sensitive cases, triad-related cases and major corruption and bribery cases are often avoided by local "leaders". Unless these lawyers have superhuman courage or "newborn calves are not afraid of tigers", they will use a lot of personal resources to "persuade" defense lawyers to change their strategies. Local cases often have to be compromised, and the case handlers are either "familiar with lawyers" or "familiar with lawyers' leadership", which leads to the lack of "freedom" for lawyers to defend.
When I go to the mainland to handle a case, foreign judges tend to be more cautious when they see "Guangdong lawyers" coming. After all, they come from "the frontier areas of reform and opening up". Even if he goes to other cities to handle cases, the judge will be much more cautious. Without the "knowledge of the root cause" of a local lawyer, who knows if this lawyer will be "unreasonable"? Because the case is handled in a different place, lawyers only need to "defend technically", and it is easy to attract the "high attention" of the case-handling organs through "defense by interception before court" or "defense by evidence in court".
In addition, when the case-handling organ sees that the family members of the parties have invited "foreign lawyers", it is easy to think that lawyers have good professional ability or "great energy" and that "foreign monks can recite scriptures". Some major sensitive cases, triad-related cases and major corruption and bribery cases need to be "impartial" because they cannot make foreign lawyers "yield". Exploring the source of foreign-related cases requires lawyers to abandon "fear" and face difficulties.