If you need a lawyer after the hearing, you can hire another lawyer for the following reasons:
1. After the first hearing, it is still possible to hold a second or third hearing. If the trial is held again, the entrusted lawyer can participate in the trial and protect the legitimate rights and interests as much as possible.
2. If the court decides directly after the trial, the entrusted lawyer can analyze the case and judgment in detail. If you are dissatisfied with the court's decision, your entrusted lawyer can appeal on your behalf, participate in the second instance proceedings and safeguard your rights and interests.
Of course, if lawyers can be hired before the first court hearing or even before bringing a lawsuit to the court, it will be more conducive to lawyers to grasp the direction and strategy of litigation from the perspective of the whole case and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests as much as possible.
Extended data:
According to Article 127 of the Civil Procedure Law, the court debates are conducted in the following order:
1. The plaintiff and his agent ad litem spoke. When both the plaintiff and the agent ad litem appear in court, the plaintiff usually speaks first and the agent ad litem supplements. The main purpose of the speech is to demonstrate one's own views and refute the facts and reasons put forward by the defendant in the court investigation, rather than repeating the contents of the statement he made in the court investigation stage.
2. The defendant and his agent ad litem shall reply. The defense of the defendant and his agent ad litem is not a simple repetition of his statement and defense in the court investigation stage, but an opinion and defense against the plaintiff and his agent ad litem, which proves that the plaintiff's claim is illegal and the court should not support it.
3, the third person and his agent ad litem to speak or reply. The third party with independent claim thinks that both the plaintiff and the defendant have violated their legitimate rights and interests. Therefore, his speech or defense is to refute the facts, reasons and requests advocated by the plaintiff and the defendant, thus proving that his legitimate rights and interests should be protected.
A third person who has no independent claim is a party with whom he has a legal relationship, and his relationship with this party is both antagonistic and unified. It is unified when targeting the other party, and there is no independent third party to assist the other party in answering and refuting the facts and requests advocated by the other party.
When it comes to the enjoyment of rights or the assumption of responsibilities in litigation, there is an antagonistic relationship between them. At this point, the third party without independent claim can answer and refute the facts, reasons and requests of the party with whom it has a legal relationship.
Baidu Encyclopedia-Trial