Can a public prosecution case be appealed?

A public prosecution case, that is, a criminal prosecution case, refers to a case in which supervisory organs at all levels, on behalf of the state, investigate the criminal responsibility of the defendant and file a lawsuit in accordance with the provisions of relevant laws and regulations. Public prosecution in criminal proceedings actually refers to a litigation activity in which the procuratorial organ investigates the cases transferred by the public security organs that have been investigated and other cases that it has investigated, and considers that the criminal facts are clear, the criminal evidence is true and sufficient, and it is suspected to constitute a crime, and the criminal responsibility of the whistleblower is investigated in accordance with relevant laws and regulations and submitted to the court for trial. This is a litigation right entrusted to the procuratorial organ to represent the country by our country's law. Also known as "public rights". According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law, if Beihai Fever and his legal representative in the case are dissatisfied with the ruling of first instance made by the people's court, they may lodge a protest with the procuratorate within five days after receiving the judgment. The procuratorate shall also make a decision on whether to protest within five days after receiving the request of the victim and his legal representative, and need to reply its decision to the requester. Therefore, if the victim in a criminal case has no right to appeal directly to the criminal part of the lawsuit, he can only make his own protest request through the procuratorate as the medium. Generally speaking, when the people's procuratorate meets the following circumstances: 1, the relevant facts of the protest are clear and the evidence of the criminal case is insufficient. One party of the procuratorate thinks that the facts ruled by the court in the judgment of first instance are not clear enough or wrong, the evidence used for identification is insufficient, or the evidence is contradictory. 2, for the original judgment, ruling according to law is incorrect. In the first-instance judgment made by the court, the procuratorate made a ruling on the application of the law, and there was an error in the conviction and sentencing of its case, either a felony or a one-sided light sentence. 3. Serious violation of due process. The people's procuratorate believes that in the first-instance judgment of this case, the court violated the relevant division of the Criminal Procedure Law, and the litigation rights that the parties should enjoy according to law were violated by others. Under the above circumstances, the court must accept the protest case put forward by the people's procuratorate, and it is necessary to start the second instance or retrial procedure in time according to the relevant laws and regulations, and make a correct and fair judgment on the facts of the case.