Although the person who does not prosecute has not obtained the guilty verdict of the court, he still has "criminal behavior". Since he has committed a crime, he should be responsible for his actions. In judicial practice, the emphasis is basically on economic compensation and whether to reduce punishment, ignoring the investigation of other factors such as the criminal suspect's repentance attitude and whether to sincerely apologize to the injured party. Moreover, it is impossible for the prosecutor to know in a short time whether the suspect really repents and whether the application of non-prosecution will lead to harmful consequences to society. Some suspects did not seriously reflect and repent after being given the opportunity not to prosecute. Instead, I think it is because I have money to "settle" the victim's side and embark on the road of illegal crime again, which makes it difficult for this system to play the role of education and rescue.