Special emphasis is placed on "simultaneity" here, because:
(1) According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, a criminal suspect and a defendant may entrust different people as his defenders at different stages of the proceedings.
(2) Even at the same defense stage, the defendant can change his defender by refusing to defend. From this perspective, in the whole litigation process of a case, a criminal suspect and defendant may entrust more than two defenders.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme People's Procuratorate both made it clear in their respective explanations that the same defender shall not accept the entrustment of more than two (including two) defendants as defenders in the same criminal case. Therefore, it should be clear that in the same criminal case, a defender can only serve as a defender for a criminal suspect or defendant forever.
It is important to note that this requirement is limited to the * * * offender in the case of * * * accomplice. If there is no * * * relationship between the defendants, such as Zhang San and Li Si * * as accomplices in robbery, and Li Si and Wang Wu are suspected of * * * theft, the People's Procuratorate has taken measures against Zhang San. Then there are two criminal facts, one is robbery and the other is theft. The people's court tried three defendants in one trial. In this so-called * * * criminal case, we can see that there is no * * criminal relationship between Zhang San and Wang Wu. So if Zhang San wants to entrust a lawyer during the trial, and the lawyer's level is very high, and Wang Wu also wants to entrust a lawyer, can the lawyer accept the entrustment of Zhang San and Wang Wu and act as a defender in the trial court at the same time? We said it should be no problem.
If it helps, please adopt it. Thank you very much