The case of killing his wife and son in Guizhou has been retried for four times, and appeals have been repeatedly made. Has he been wronged or not?

It is not clear whether he has been wronged, but judging from the contents of the news release, there should be insider information. The whole incident revolved around a man who deliberately killed his wife and dismembered her body, but among those who later helped him cry, there were his parents-in-law, so it seems that this matter may really have a grudge.

First, many doubts in this case cannot be explained at all, and the content of Li's confession is different every time. Li's attorney believes that there are many unresolved problems in this case. In the original judgment, the court held that Li used a kitchen knife to dismember the body at home. In the test results at that time, it was not detected that the kitchen knife contained blood. The most important thing is that what Li said when explaining his killing process is different every time. The contents of the previous times are far from the last one.

In Li's confession, although inconsistent, the same content is that the deceased died of suffocation. In his description, it is not that he strangled his wife or killed her with something. If what he said is true, it is impossible to cause such a big blood flow. If he was really killed with a knife or other object, there would be no suffocation. And his kitchen knife didn't detect the characteristics of dismemberment, no blade, no damage and no blood, so Li

Second, the parents-in-law went into battle to help Li scream. Maybe there is something in it, otherwise how could they help the suspect? The most incomprehensible thing about this is Li's parents-in-law. According to common sense, the court ruled that the son-in-law killed his daughter. Then the old couple will sneer at their son-in-law, and they want to punch twice if they don't meet, but they don't want to see each other. They were disgusted at the name, but the old couple were one of the main figures who shouted for Li. Li Popo once said that she thought her daughter's death must be related to Li, but it should be a tragedy caused by his infidelity.

Although he died because he did something wrong, it should not be Li who killed his daughter, let alone Li's own child. He shouldn't treat his own flesh and blood like this. With this idea, they think that this matter has nothing to do with Li, so they can't be influenced by their own grief when facing right and wrong. In this case, revenge for Li has become what they should do.

Finally: the court sentenced the son-in-law to kill his daughter, and the father-in-law and mother-in-law helped to cry out grievances. This is the first time I've seen it. It's really an eye-opener. If the man finally upheld the original judgment, how could the couple feel embarrassed!