Mo Huanjing's defense lawyer
65438+February 2 1, during the trial of Hangzhou nanny arson case, the defendant Mo Moumou's defender and lawyer Dang Moumou of Guangdong Zengtai Law Firm left the court without authorization, which was exposed by the media and aroused widespread concern in society. On the 22nd, the person in charge of the relevant department of the Guangdong Provincial Department of Justice responded that the Provincial Department of Justice attached great importance to this matter and immediately sent an investigation team to Hangzhou to conduct an investigation.
After reading the trial video, consulting relevant records, and combining with the judicial advice of the court hearing the case, the investigation team initially determined that the lawyers of the parties were suspected of disobeying the court discipline, leaving the court without authorization, interfering with normal litigation procedures, and using the Internet to speculate on the case, causing serious social impact. According to the Lawyers Law and the relevant regulations on the management of lawyers' practice, the judicial administrative organ decided to impose administrative punishment on the parties suspected of violating laws and regulations. The judicial administrative organs of Guangdong Province will conscientiously perform their supervisory duties, severely investigate and deal with violations of laws and regulations according to law, resolutely safeguard the legal authority and safeguard the good professional image of lawyers.
review
Hangzhou nanny arson case suspended for half an hour.
At 9: 00 on February 2 1 day, Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court held a public hearing in the Second Court to hear the case of the defendant Mo Huanjing's arson and theft. After the trial began, the presiding judge asked whether the defendant and the defender applied for withdrawal according to law. Lawyer Dang Linshan, the defender of the defendant Mo Huanjing, asked the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court to stop hearing the case on the grounds of asking for the designation of a court other than the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court for jurisdiction in different places. The presiding judge informed the defender according to law that the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court has jurisdiction over the case according to the provisions of Articles 20 and 24 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC). Subsequently, lawyer Dang Linshan, the defender, ignored the court discipline, disobeyed the command of the presiding judge, left the court without authorization and refused to continue to defend the defendant Mo Huanjing. The presiding judge then decided to adjourn the court according to law.
According to "the Supreme People's Court on the application"
Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court will fully protect the defendant's right to defense and continue to hear the case on another day.