When raising objections to jurisdiction, we need to pay attention to the following matters: first, we need to determine why the court is considered to have no jurisdiction. It may be because the plaintiff chose the wrong court, or it may be because the place involved, the subject matter or the defendant's residence are not directly related to the court. You also need to consult relevant laws to ensure that your views are correct. Second, evidence is needed to support the view. This evidence may include documents, witness statements or other relevant information. These evidences need to be prepared and provided to the court in due course. Finally, we should use appropriate legal procedures to raise objections. Specifically, it is necessary to write a formal document explaining opinions and evidence and submit it to the court. It is also necessary to send a notice to the opposing lawyer to inform the court that it intends to raise an objection.
Under what circumstances can the court refuse to accept jurisdictional objections? If the court considers that the defendant does not actively raise objections or does not provide sufficient evidence to support his views, the court may refuse to accept jurisdictional objections. In addition, if the court thinks that the issue of jurisdiction is very basic, or the defendant has known it but has not raised it, the court may think that the defendant has waived his rights and decided not to consider the objection.
Jurisdiction objection is a key legal procedure, which helps to close the case before the prosecution begins. If you are sued and think that the court has no jurisdiction, please take immediate action and raise an objection to the court as soon as possible. At the same time, make sure to prepare all necessary evidence and use the correct procedure to submit objections.
Legal basis:
Article 21 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court of the defendant's domicile. If the defendant's domicile is inconsistent with his habitual residence, it shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court of habitual residence. A civil lawsuit brought against a legal person or other organization shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the defendant is domiciled.