What are the three types of perjury crimes that lawyers may be involved in? The crime of lawyer perjury exists in Article 306 of our country’s Criminal Law. Article 306 stipulates: In criminal proceedings, defenders or agents ad litem (1) destroy evidence or fabricate evidence; (2) help the parties to destroy evidence or fabricate evidence; (3) threaten or induce witnesses to change their testimony or make statements contrary to the facts. Anyone who gives false testimony shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than 3 years or criminal detention; if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 3 years but not more than 7 years. The first type: the actor directly destroys or falsifies evidence, that is, the actor personally performs the act or omission; the second type: the actor helps destroy or falsify evidence, that is, the person who really destroys or falsifies is not the defender, but the facilitator Providing convenience and causing others to perform actions or omissions through certain actions or omissions; the third type: the perpetrator threatens or induces the witness to change his or her testimony or commit perjury, that is, the third party influences the third party to perform the action or omission through his or her own actions. as. The first behavior is that the defender personally destroys and falsifies evidence, which is unlikely. Because destruction and forgery are easier to identify in specific judicial practice, and their behavior is relatively intuitive: "Destruction" means the disappearance or destruction of evidence in a case; "forgery" is the creation of evidence from scratch or from something to nothing. process. It is unlikely that the defender will directly destroy or forge, and it is also quite rare in cases where lawyers have intervened in the past. As defenders, few lawyers who have passed the national judicial examination at least know about the profession of lawyer. After graduating from a bachelor's degree, passing the judicial examination and then interning in a law firm for a period of time before obtaining a lawyer's practicing certificate. I think that it has not reached a certain level. For the purpose of directly and blatantly destroying and fabricating evidence at the risk of going to jail. So what is the reason that causes many lawyers to go to jail? The author has made a statement before. What really puts lawyers in jail are the latter two situations: one is "helping" the client to destroy or falsify evidence; the other is "inducing" witnesses to change their testimony or commit perjury. If there are issues that require communication and resolution, and if you are not clear about the content and want to know more about it, it is recommended that you seek help from an online lawyer in a timely manner.