Lawyers must understand the procedure when handling litigation business, and the three major procedural laws are procedural laws. If you don't know the procedure, you can't file a case, pay legal fees, avoid, try, and so on.
Procedural law is the guarantee of substantive justice. If a lawyer doesn't know the procedure, from the client's point of view, this lawyer is unprofessional, which will greatly affect the client's evaluation of your professional services. This is because the parties may not understand the substantive law, and the procedural things are obvious. It is easy for the client to judge whether you, as his lawyer, have achieved procedural justice in safeguarding the interests of the client. This will affect your reputation and increase your resistance to developing business.
From the perspective of non-litigation business, litigation is the basis of non-litigation. A lawyer who wants to do non-litigation business cases must be based on rich litigation experience. For example, when reviewing a contract, he should pay attention to the issue of jurisdiction and stipulate that the jurisdiction of the contract is in the court where the parties are located, so that he can save a lot of expenses (time cost and economic cost) for the parties after the dispute arises. Three major procedural laws are the basis of litigation business.
However, this does not mean that lawyers must fully master the three major procedural laws. In practice, lawyers have a firmer grasp of the civil procedure law than criminal proceedings, and criminal proceedings are stronger than administrative proceedings. The reason is that there are more lawyers in civil disputes than in criminal proceedings, and fewer lawyers in administrative proceedings. From the lawyer's point of view, if lawyers focus on civil litigation or only deal with civil disputes, they can completely ignore the Criminal Procedure Law and the Administrative Procedure Law.
The above suggestions are for reference only! ! !