Watermark Kang Ting Building 12, Room 12 This house has three rooms, and the intermediary rents it to three households. Gao Xiao and her boyfriend live in a room with a balcony. On the morning of October 25th, Gao Xiao's roommate Zhou Xiao was the only one at home.
Zhou Xiao, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting Building: "I didn't respond when I knocked at the door for the first time, and then I knocked at the door for the second time. It should be 1: 48 when I open it. They directly said that our balcony was on fire, but I was still puzzled at that time, because the doors on their side (Gao Xiao) were locked, and I didn't do it at all.
Zhou Xiao said that at that time, four security guards of the property put out the fire with fire extinguishers in the corridor, and the balcony fire was put out in less than ten minutes. Gao Xiao went to work nearby. I heard that my house was on fire, so I came back at eleven.
Gao Xiao, tenant 12 on the 12th floor of Shuiyin Kang Ting Building, said, "We mainly put a big shoe rack. If you have shoes, there are about thirty or forty pairs, and then there are coffee tables, small cabinets, folding chairs, electric fans and nothing else. And if we have this circuit, only our room has a socket, and the balcony does not. "
Gao Xiao said that everything put on the balcony was burned, some of the fence glass on the balcony was burned, and a big hole was burned in a glass door connecting the bedroom. Fortunately, the fire did not spread indoors.
the cause of the fire cannot be determined. Gao Xiao, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting: "(Have you found out the cause of the fire at present?" If we say the cause of the fire, because the property asked me to clean it up at that time, and then when the fire came to identify it, we said that we could not identify the reason. "
Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Greentown Property: "This is definitely not what we said. If they think we called them, then I think their clients should also have some legal knowledge. For example, this fire scene cannot be easily entered or cleaned up. "
the property is cut off from water and electricity due to medical expenses?
Gao Xiao said that on October 25, 165438, the property cut off water and electricity to the home, which has not helped to recover. Some of them stayed outside in hotels, while others stayed at friends' homes for eight or nine days.
Gao Xiao, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting Building, said, "We were delayed for several days, and then we called the Power Bureau and asked them to come and help us supply electricity and move in (do you think the property has the right to cut off the electricity for you? This is definitely no right, and they have said it themselves. "
Zhou Xiao, a tenant on the 12th floor of Building 12 in Shuiyin Kang Ting, said, "We thought they were going to investigate the fire source and cut off the power supply, but we didn't speak. Then on October 28th, when we went to the police station for consultation, they said, to put it bluntly, I heard a very important point, that is, the reason of medical expenses, so if you cut off the electricity for us, then
Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Management Office of Greentown Property: "This is completely coordinated.
The investigation on the cause of indoor fire is very clear. Water and electricity are cut off. I'll send it up later. "
four security guards spent 96 yuan on medical expenses for inhaling toxic gas.
Manager Zhou of Greentown Property said that on June 25th, four security guards were admitted to the hospital for inhaling toxic gas during the 165438+ fire fighting, and three of them were discharged on the same day. Their security guard suffered from "smoke poisoning" and was discharged after being hospitalized for three days. The medical expenses of four people, a total of * * * spent about 96.
Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Management Office of Greentown Property: "We hope that the medical expenses will be borne by their direct beneficiaries and their tenants, so other expenses will be compensated appropriately."
Gao Xiao, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting Building: "He helped me put out the fire in time and minimized my losses. I'm sure it's the beneficiary, but we can't find any cause of the fire. We are also the injured party, our own loss and the loss of this room. We will also be responsible at that time. "
Both Gao Xiao and his roommate said that it is a brave act for security guards to help put out the fire, which is definitely worth encouraging. They will express their gratitude in their own form, but Greentown Property said that they are the biggest beneficiaries and asked them to bear all medical expenses together with the intermediary. They think they can't understand.
tenants: it's unreasonable to put the responsibility on them.
Gao Xiao, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting Building: "Because this fire started in our room, of course we have to bear some responsibilities, but if all the responsibilities are put on us as they say, we think it is unreasonable."
Xiao Wang, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting Building: "I don't think I need to take this responsibility. If I have, it means that we are a family, because there is a fire on our side. As a kind of sympathy, we have an obligation to help them, but we didn't say that we must push this responsibility to us because we are also victims. "
Shi Hao Winbond: We will cooperate actively.
Xiao Shao, an agent of Shi Hao Winbond Watermark Kang Ting Store, said, "First of all, we have a positive attitude of cooperation. We will definitely bear the responsibility. "
the security guard didn't pay social security?
Zhou Xiao, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting Building: "They didn't pay the social security themselves, and then he said that their social security was reimbursed by themselves, and the company reimbursed them part of it, and then we shared the rest, but after we went there yesterday to look at the list, it was all at our own expense."
Gao Xiao, tenant 12, 12th floor, Shuiyin Kang Ting Building: "We also asked other security guards to know the situation privately, saying that they didn't pay social security."
Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Greentown Property: "Our security company is Greentown Security. We signed a contract with them. It is clearly stated in the contract that all security guards must pay social security (it is clearly stated in the contract, but the question is whether they have paid it? This is a problem for outsourcing companies. Even without medical insurance, there is public liability insurance. "
property: if negotiation fails, it can be solved through legal channels.
Manager Zhou of Greentown Property said that the current medical expenses of 9,6 yuan are not the final figure, and can be negotiated again. If negotiation fails, it can be settled through legal channels.
Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Greentown Property: "Their property suffered losses, but our employees went to put out the fire. They are the direct beneficiaries of the fire. They are the direct beneficiaries of the fire, so we came to talk to him about it. I also made it clear to him that it doesn't matter if they don't compensate. We will sue them through legal channels. "
fire fighting equipment is complete, but time is tight?
In addition, Zhou Jing would like to mention that they have a special miniature fire station in Shuiyin Kang Ting Community, and all the fire fighting equipment is complete. On October 25th, 165438, all four security guards involved in the fire fighting did not wear gas masks to put out the fire, because time was short.
Manager Zhou of Hangzhou Watermark Greentown Property: "When this security guard found the fire, it happened to be downstairs, and there was already smoke at that time, so the security guard didn't delay putting out the fire at the first time. So, he rushed to the scene of the fire at the first time, put out the fire, and we also found it at the scene of the fire. When we entered the fire scene, the glass door outside had been melted, and the cloth inside, that is, the curtains, had all caught fire.
lawyer: the medical expenses should be borne by the beneficiary or the responsible person.
The reporter also consulted lawyer Chen Songtao, the director of Zhejiang Guo Feng Law Firm, about the compensation for medical expenses of security guards. Lawyer Chen said that the security fire fighting is an emergency in law, and the medical expenses caused by physical injury should be borne by the beneficiary or the responsible person.
Chen Songtao, director of Zhejiang Guo Feng Law Firm, said, "That is to say, the person responsible for the fire can't be determined yet. In this case, based on the principle of fairness and reasonableness, the three tenants should be the beneficiaries, because if the security guards do not put out the fire, the fire may spread and their losses will be great. So in this case, some medical expenses of security guards will be borne by these three tenants. Legally, the intermediary may not need to be here.
As for whether the medical expenses are reimbursed by the medical insurance, Mr. Chen said that this is only a matter between the security guard and the property management company, and has nothing to do with the three tenants. Tenants can negotiate to determine the compensation ratio.
Chen Songtao, director of Zhejiang Guo Feng Law Firm, said: "The behavior of security guards is a courageous act. Legally, we all regard it as a work-related injury. In other words, if these security guards and his injured medical expenses are all lost, then the expenses should be borne by the property company, which means that the security guards themselves do not have to worry about medical expenses. "