On February 22nd, 2113, Haidian Branch of Beijing Public Security Bureau reported that Li Shuangjiang's son Li Tianyi (Li Guanfeng) was suspected of raping a woman. The police revealed that on February 9, 2113, Haidian Branch received an alarm from a woman victim, saying that on the evening of February 7, she was taken to a hotel for gang rape after drinking with Li and others in a bar in Haidian District. After receiving the police, the branch immediately started work. On February 21, five people, including Li, were arrested. Now the five people are criminally detained on suspicion of rape.
Li Tianyi's alleged gang rape case continues to ferment, which has become the most concerned topic of the people. The strong concern and anger given by China netizens have also attracted the attention of foreign media. The media in the United States, France, India, Japan and other countries have reported on this matter, and Li Tianyi has become an "international celebrity".
Lawyer Tian Shenjun was entrusted by Ms. Yang, the victim of this case, to become a rights lawyer.
On July 11, 2113, lawyer Tian Shenjun received a statement from Ms. Yang, the victim of the case of Li Tianyi. Seeing the statement made by Li's newly hired lawyer who was suspected of raping Ms. Yang and her statement that she wanted to defend Li's innocence, the victim, Ms. Yang, felt extremely sad and heartbroken, and entrusted Tian Shenjun, a lawyer from Beijing Zhongshou Law Firm, to make the following statement: < P > 1. Although Ms. Yang realized that the defender had the right to defend the defendant, she was still extremely shocked and angry to learn that Li's newly hired lawyer wanted to defend him.
First of all, after repeated investigations by the public security organs and prosecution by the procuratorate, the fact that Li was suspected of rape has become very clear. Moreover, in the case that Li's former lawyer was faced with the excessive demands of Li's mother-"I want the lawyer to write an announcement saying that Li was not involved in the alleged rape case" and withdrew from the case, Li's new lawyer still ignored the public opinion and objective facts, and wanted to defend him not guilty, which was extremely shocking!
Secondly, the victim, Ms. Yang, has been beaten, insulted and violently abused by Li Moumou and others in an isolated situation, and her body and mind have been greatly devastated. After the incident, the victim, Ms. Yang, was repeatedly intimidated and threatened by Li Moumou, trying to prevent the victim from publicizing the matter. The victim experienced two days and two nights in fear and helplessness, and did not dare to talk to anyone. He was afraid that his family would not be able to stand the blow when they knew it, and that the other party would use their power to cover up the matter and even retaliate against the victim, but the victim finally chose to report the case.
Up to now, the victim has not received the minimum humanitarian condolences and apologies from Li's guardian or family, and can only hide in an unknown corner and feel sad and sad alone. When a weak woman from other places was in trouble and helpless, she was shocked to hear that Li's newly hired defender made a bold statement that she wanted to defend Li. The victim, Ms. Yang's fragile nerves and bleeding heart, was once again hit by a new blow, which was tantamount to adding salt to the wound and made Ms. Yang even more pessimistic and disappointed about whether the case could be tried fairly. One side is a well-known public figure, and the other side is a helpless woman who came to Beijing from other places. The victim, Ms. Yang, can only be boundless anger except resignation!
Thirdly, Ms. Yang, the victim, heard that the newly hired lawyer who wants to defend Li's innocence is good at criminal defense and has a good industry reputation. But I don't know why, this time, regardless of his own image and reputation, he was willing to take the world by storm and insisted on defending Li's innocence. The victim, Ms. Yang, was deeply saddened by it. I hope the lawyer can put himself in the other's shoes. If the victim in this case is his female family, will he still defend the defendant's innocence?
Second, the lawyer's statement issued by Li's two newly hired lawyers is one-sided with the facts of Jin Chen and quoted the law, which is too partial to the defendant Li.
1. The statement said, "On February 22nd this year, after a branch of Beijing Public Security Bureau disclosed the alleged rape case of Li Moumou to the whole society with his real name, it was almost the first time to disclose the alleged rape case of Li Moumou with his real name. Not only many local media, major portals, but also many central mainstream media made a lot of infringement reports on the minor suspect Li Moumou and his family through public disclosure of names, pictures and videos." It is one-sided.
First of all, there is no evidence to prove that a branch of Beijing Public Security Bureau took the lead in disclosing Li's alleged rape case to the whole society with his real name. As we all know, it was a netizen who claimed to be "the editor of the website of Hong Kong South China Morning Post", not a branch of Beijing Public Security Bureau, who first disclosed Li's alleged rape letter.
on the contrary, the branch has protected the privacy of minors involved to the maximum extent. Because, until today, the branch has withstood the great pressure of public opinion and has never disclosed the relevant information of other minors in the same case. Not only that, but even the information of adult criminal suspects has not been disclosed.
Secondly, after the case is disclosed, the media have the obligation to report the case in order to exercise the function of social supervision, so as to punish the evil and promote the good. Perhaps, during the period, some media reported on a large scale, which caused certain public pressure on Li Moumou and his family, but it should not be considered as intentional infringement on them.
Because Li's parents are both famous singers and "old artists" in China, they have enjoyed a high social reputation, good social visibility and enjoyed more social resources for a long time, so they are usually called social public figures. The privacy infringement of public figures should be restricted to some extent for ordinary people. As the son of a public figure, Li Moumou was led by his parents to participate in various cultural performances and social public activities since he was a child. He also enjoys a high social popularity and can also be regarded as a public figure. Its privacy should also be properly restricted. In other words, the media have supervised and reported their private lives on behalf of society.
2. This statement only quotes the relevant provisions of Article 58 of the Protection of Minors in the People's Republic of China to demonstrate that Li Moumou, who is still a minor, should be protected, which is one-sided.
because the state has enacted the Law on the Protection of Minors in order to comprehensively protect the legitimate and wasteful interests of minors through various channels. In this law, it is not only stipulated that the society should protect the legitimate rights of minors, but also stipulated that the parents of minors should protect the legitimate rights of minors.
For example, Article 9 of China's Law on the Protection of Minors stipulates: "Parents or other guardians should respect the right of minors to receive education, and must make school-age minors receive compulsory education according to regulations, and must not make minors who receive compulsory education drop out of school." And in this case, did Li's parents fulfill this obligation? Whether to let Li, who is still in the compulsory education stage, drop out of school?
For another example, Article 11 of China's Law on the Protection of Minors also stipulates: "Parents or other guardians should educate minors with healthy thoughts, conduct and appropriate methods, guide minors to engage in activities beneficial to their physical and mental health, and prevent and stop minors from smoking, drinking, wandering, gambling, drug abuse and prostitution." In this case, did Li's parents fulfill this obligation? Whether to teach Li Moumou the * * * capitalist world outlook, values and outlook on life. Even whether the education does not violate the law and social morality.
3. The statement also said, "This case happened after a minor waited in a bar late at night and was persuaded to drink heavily by a number of adult male and female bar staff." The implication is that drinking is the inducement for her to rape others, and drinking is the chief culprit in this rape case. According to its logic, it seems that all shopping malls, restaurants, bars, etc. selling wine should be closed. Otherwise, once someone rapes someone's wife and daughter after drinking, the person who sells alcohol will be convicted, but the person who commits the rape is not guilty. How ridiculous is this view? Isn't drunken rape rape a rape?
Ms. Yang, the victim, can understand the position and mood of Li's newly hired defender to serve her client, but she hopes that they can respect the facts and carry out defense work within the scope permitted by law and professional ethics, and don't challenge the bottom line of law and the public for some unspeakable reason, and cause secondary harm to the victim.