And support is divided into several types:
Will parents received around * * * life, tea and rice.
Send it to a nursing home and visit it three or four times a week, with supplements and fruits for half a day at a time.
Let parents live alone, but visit them every week.
Only give basic living expenses (several hundred yuan per month), and don't care about anything (no visits, no greetings).
So how do you judge whether you should support it, and what kind of support should it be?
Personally, I think that the first thing people who get money should do is to live with their elderly parents.
If the party who can't get the money is obsessed with this problem, I think we should start from the emotional aspect! Then roughly point out the following two points:
Although parents leave money to their sons, they also take good care of their daughters and pay a lot of love.
In this case, the daughter should also fulfill her maintenance obligations. After all, your parents love you as much as your son, and you should return a lot of love to your parents!
Parents not only leave money to their sons, but also do not treat their daughters equally.
In this case, it's good for my daughter to visit once in a while!
Moreover, the question of whether a daughter who has not inherited property should support the elderly is inherently biased: whether a daughter supports the elderly is not the key point, but whether a son who has divided the property should support the elderly.
"When you divide the property, you benefit from your son. When you need to support the elderly, do you need to find a daughter? "
If you want to leave your son property according to ancient laws, you are counting on raising your son to prevent old age.
Then under this logic, the daughter certainly does not need to support her parents!
At this time, some tricky parents will jump out and say, "According to the law, you have the obligation to provide for my old age. If you don't support me, I will sue you ... "
Yes, according to today's law, it is certainly not wrong to say so.
However, if we talk about property, we should follow the ancient law, and if we talk about providing for the aged, we should move the law. Isn't this really cheating your daughter?
Every family has a difficult experience, so in the end it can only be summarized as follows:
According to the law, children who do not inherit property have to fulfill their maintenance obligations.
But if parents themselves are unfair to their daughters, it is logically impossible to want high-quality old-age care.