Nowadays, the Internet is becoming more and more developed, so many people in remote rural areas have started the online live broadcast industry. Selling some local specialties or selling some self-prepared things can not only bring them a This income can also make more people know about rural local products. A man from Guizhou helped his old father sell home-made sauerkraut during a live broadcast. However, he was complained that the sauerkraut was a Sanwu product and required a refund and a refund of 1,000 yuan. The other party's statement is indeed reasonable, because the products sold by the grandfather are indeed processed products, and relevant documents need to be provided.
1. A man in Guizhou was compensated 1,000 yuan for 9 portions of homemade sauerkraut for 9 yuan
On March 1, 2022, Lin posted a video on a social platform. In the video Li's father was told that he was compensated 1,000 yuan for selling homemade sauerkraut online. The video quickly received over 10,000 likes, 70,000 and more than 4,000 comments, with netizens expressing sympathy for the old man. The party concerned also responded to the incident through a short video, explaining the specific details of the incident. Because the sauerkraut bought after the buyer complained was a three-no product, according to regulations, the seller must return the money and compensate the buyer 1,000 Yuan, the buyer also said that if he gave the money, he would get the money back.
2. The other party’s statement is indeed reasonable, because the old man’s homemade sauerkraut is indeed a three-no product. Although the seller's sauerkraut is not a packaged food, it is an edible agricultural product, and it is sold without a production license or production date. If it is sold as agricultural products, professional qualification testing is required, and these have not been done, so the buyer There is a certain legal basis for making a claim.
But from a moral point of view, if the buyer is a professional anti-counterfeiter and seeks compensation for profit, such behavior is not worth encouraging. Public opinion is now one-sided, with netizens expressing sympathy for the elderly and questioning that the seller is a professional crackdown on counterfeiters. This behavior is also a disguised form of extortion.