Due to the wide scope of many cases, relevant cases are not allowed to be announced to the public before the trial. This is also to prevent the trial from being pressured by public opinion, which would lead to the judge making an unfair judgment during free testimony.
As society gradually realizes the interconnection of all things, network technology gradually replaces traditional methods in relevant agencies to improve work efficiency. Relevant authorities issued arrest warrants online with the purpose of imposing social sanctions on criminal suspects through online means and using the power of the people to fight crime to the end. The power of the people is great. As social creatures, human beings must be inseparable from the society as a group. Therefore, when the relevant departments issue an arrest warrant before a criminal suspect is brought to justice, they will say that there is a major criminal case at large, in order to warn the general public that the criminal suspect is in great danger, and at the same time, it is also to provide him with information about the case in which the criminal suspect is involved. Qualitative. Let the general public join hands with the police to catch the murderer while ensuring their own safety.
I believe that some citizens will be interested in the details of major criminal cases and they are eager to know what cases the arrestees are involved in. However, in order to ensure judicial fairness and the privacy of the parties involved, the facts of the relevant cases cannot be disclosed to the public until they are clearly defined and the trial is concluded. Citizens can remain curious and make inquiries on the day the case is pronounced.
A case can be talked about by others after dinner, but it should not receive too much extra-judicial attention and pressure during the trial process. This is to ensure that criminal suspects receive fair litigation rights, while combating crime and protecting rights.