Are criminal defense lawyers responsible?

This is definitely a process service, not a result service. Even if you are a risk agent, it is only the lawyer who shares the risk with you and tries to mobilize the enthusiasm of the lawyer as much as possible, rather than the lawyer locking the results in the safe for you. It's not beautiful.

In the process of agency, lawyers will undoubtedly pay a lot of efforts and energy. Investigating and collecting evidence and analyzing cases that cite laws and regulations are things that clients can't do by themselves, and they can only hope on more professional lawyers.

In addition, in the process of trial, it is undoubtedly more powerful for lawyers to communicate with judges in the direction of litigation, and the parties themselves are likely to be obsessed with their favorite points and the focus of court review, which may be completely different, and the final result will naturally be affected.

Lawyers exist to make the litigation process more professional and have higher coping ability, at least not to suffer from details such as procedures. If the case itself can be won, the existence of lawyers will make the odds even better. If the case itself has a greater probability of losing the case, the existence of lawyers may also reduce this probability, and at the same time, it is unknown to seize the omissions in the other party's litigation process and pick up a rake.