On August 20, 2020, a video of a man beating a child was uploaded online, which caused a heated discussion for a time. According to the investigation, on August 19, 2020, Jintai Branch of Baoji Public Security Bureau of Shaanxi Province received an alarm saying that an injury occurred in Jinling Bay Community. After the criminal suspect Liu was drunk, he had a dispute with his girlfriend because of the problem of raising children, and lifted the child and slammed it on the sofa, causing the child to be injured. After being sent to the hospital for treatment, the news of the boy's death was uploaded on 2 1.
Second, why doesn't my mother stop taking pictures beside me?
The news of the boy's death on 2 1 aroused the anger of netizens. Netizens believe that the man has constituted the crime of intentional homicide and should be investigated for legal responsibility. Although this person has done harm to young children after drinking. However, the man has full capacity for civil conduct. As the father of the child, he not only failed to take good care of the child, but also deliberately harmed the child's personal safety, which directly led to the child's death. But the photographer of the video at that time should also be investigated for legal responsibility. Because the video shooter (the child's mother) did not stop the man's violence at the scene. Netizens agreed that they should be investigated for legal responsibility. However, his mother claimed that she was usually afraid of criminal suspects. In addition, there is a disability in the leg, which can't be stopped in time. I can only take a video to leave evidence.
Third, is the mother's behavior illegal?
Some lawyers believe that it is the father who intentionally hurts the child, and the father should bear criminal responsibility. If the video shooter and the suspect agree to take pictures. Constitute an accomplice. If his mother just makes a video and leaves evidence, it is not a crime. Lawyer Zhang Xiaojun said? For video photographers, if they are related by blood or guardianship, they have the obligation to take care of their children's health. If you don't assume the responsibility of guardianship, you may not be able to pursue legal responsibility. But even the person with guardianship responsibility, if his motive is not to let Liu intentionally hurt the child but to record the other person's injury behavior, objectively leads to the continuous occurrence of injury behavior and eventually leads to the death of the child, his behavior must be negligence, but he may still not bear legal responsibility. ? Whether the photographer is held accountable depends on the starting point and motivation of shooting, and further investigation by the police is needed.