According to the case report issued by the Commission for Discipline Inspection of Jiyuan City, Zhai Qing, born in June,19591kloc-0, was a cadre of Yaqiao neighborhood committee in Yuquan street of Jiyuan City./kloc-0 joined the China * * * production party in July 1985, and has been the deputy secretary of the party group of Jiyuan People's Court since April 20 10.
Upon investigation, from June 20 12 to June 201/year, his son Zhai Yuenan guaranteed Zhao a high-interest loan of 590,000 yuan for Wang. After the arrears expired, Wang was unable to repay and transferred the property mortgaged to Zhao to another creditor, Zhang. 2065438+At the beginning of September 2004, Zhao asked Wang and Zhai Yuenan to issue IOUs 13 16000 yuan according to the principal and interest, and Zhai Yuenan was caught in a debt dispute.
In order to get my son out of the dispute and ignore the court leaders in charge of executing the case, I found Zhao (the applicant for executing the case in the municipal court) and others for consultation many times. Finally, it was agreed that Zhang would sell the above-mentioned real estate, and after deducting his due part, he would return the remaining house payment to Zhao, and the debts of all parties would be settled. Shimou, a party to another criminal case in the city court, learned of this situation and proposed to buy this property for his daughter. As the vice president in charge of criminal cases, Zhai Qing agreed. Later, Zhai Qing actively participated in and managed to facilitate this real estate transaction.
It is reported that from July 26, 2007 to July 26, 2065438, the Standing Committee of Jiyuan Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection decided to give Zhai Qing a serious warning within the party and suggested that he be transferred from the political and legal system.
Jiyuan City Commission for Discipline Inspection said in the circular that Zhai Qing, as a leading cadre of the municipal court, violated the discipline of honesty, took advantage of his position to deal with the economic disputes between his family and the parties to the case in violation of regulations, which seriously damaged the prestige and image of the judicial organs and had a bad influence on the unit and society.