My name is Gao Duoyou. I am from Xiwang Village, Jinjing Township, Yanhu District, Yuncheng City, Shanxi Province. China is now a country with a sound legal system. Now I'll mail you this verdict. I'll show you later.
I know how the following courts handle cases and why there are so many people rushing to the petition line. Whether everyone is equal before the law. Why such a simple case was supervised by the National People's Congress in 2004, and it has not been solved until now. I don't ask much. It only requires that Judge Lin Jing should be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law, and the Ministry of Public Security should re-evaluate the loan.
People's Court of Yanhu District, Yuncheng City, Shanxi Province
civil judgment
(2000) Yun Yan Min Er Zai Zi No.529
Plaintiff Yuncheng Jinjing Rural Cooperative Foundation.
Legal Representative Wang Xilu, male, director.
Authorized Agent: Wang, male, 52 years old, agent of Jinjing Township Foundation.
Defendant Gao Duoyou in the original trial, male, born on February 4, 196 1, Han nationality, farmer in Xiwang Village, Jinjing Township, Yanhu District, Yuncheng City.
The plaintiff Yuncheng Jinjing Rural Cooperative Foundation in the original trial had a loan contract dispute with the defendant Gao Duo in the original trial. In 2000, our hospital.
(2000) Jing Yun No.529 Civil Mediation was made on August 17, and it has taken legal effect. After the original trial, the defendant Gao Duo.
If there is any complaint, our court will retry the case on February/2002 10 with the civil ruling of (2002) YAN SHEN JIAN Zi No.23. and
During the trial, a collegial panel was formed separately according to law, and the case was heard in public. The plaintiff in the original trial, his entrusted agent and the defendant in the original trial appeared in court.
The lawsuit is now over.
The original trial found that on 19971October 5,1March 2, 9981day,1February 18, the defendant Gao Duo had followed the plaintiff.
Dispose of three times * * * to borrow 2630 yuan, without paying interest. During the trial, the defendant admitted that the arrears were true and expressed his active repayment. basis
During the trial of this case, both parties reached the following agreement voluntarily through mediation conducted by our court: 1. The defendant Gao owed the plaintiff a loan; 2.
630 yuan and interest shall be paid before August 30, 2000. Second, the case acceptance fee 140 yuan, other legal fees.
Fifty yuan, * * * 190 yuan shall be borne by the defendant Gao Duoyou.
After the conciliation statement came into effect, due to the appeal of the defendant in the original trial, the case was submitted by the president of our hospital to the judicial Committee for discussion, and the original trial procedure was considered illegal and the facts were ascertained.
If it is unclear, it shall be handled in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 177 and Article 183 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC).
Retrial.
Upon retrial, it was found that the defendant in the original trial Gao Duo 199715 borrowed 630 yuan from the plaintiff foundation in the original trial,13/998,
2/borrowed from Kloc-0/1, 000 yuan, twice borrowed from Kloc-0/,630 yuan, and paid off by the interest department in September 2002. The original judgment of the above facts is
There is no objection to the complaint and it has been confirmed in court. Regarding the complaint filed by the plaintiff in the original trial, the defendant in the original trial borrowed money on 19981February 18 1000.
In the retrial, it was said that the defendant in the original trial had paid off on July 5, 2002. Because the agent didn't draw the IOUs, there was a lawsuit error, and the defendant was tried in the original trial.
Deny. The retrial also found that the original trial was not held in court, and although there was a conciliation statement, it was not the original trial, and both defendants signed it, and the conciliation statement was delivered to the defendants in the original trial.
The defendant in the original trial did not sign the service receipt, and the original trial procedure was seriously illegal. Due to violation of procedure, the facts of the original trial were unclear.
We believe that the case was not heard in court, and the evidence advocated by the plaintiff in the original trial was not cross-examined in court. In the absence of both parties in court,
A conciliation statement was formed, which violated the law. Although the amount of the loan sued by the plaintiff in the original trial was wrong, the defendant in the original trial borrowed 1630 yuan from the plaintiff in the original trial and should pay it off.
(All principal and interest have been paid off after the lawsuit). The defendant in the original trial has confirmed this. The conciliation statement of the original trial shall be revoked according to law, and the defendant in the original trial shall be investigated for responsibility during retrial.
The false accusation made by the plaintiff in the original trial shall be handled separately. Therefore, according to the provisions of Articles 180th and 177th of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), China
The people of China * * * and the provisions of Article 108 of the General Principles of State Law make the following judgment:
First, cancel the (2000) Jing Yun No.629th civil mediation.
Second, the defendant in the original trial repaid the plaintiff Jinjing Township, Yuncheng City.
The cooperative foundation borrowed 1630 yuan with interest (the arrears and interest were paid off in September 2002).
The first-instance acceptance fee of this case is 140 yuan, and other legal fees are 50 yuan, totaling 190 yuan, which shall be borne by the plaintiff in the first instance.
If you refuse to accept this judgment, you can submit an appeal to our court within 15 days from the date of service of the judgment, and submit copies according to the number of the other parties, and appeal to
Yuncheng Intermediate People's Court of Shanxi Province.
Presiding Judge Zhao Guoqiang
Judge Tong Huiying
Acting Judge Mao Yingting
March 3(rd), 2003
Staff Li Qi
Hire a lawyer with a high salary
My name is Gao Duoyou, from Xiwang Village, Jinjing Township, Yanhu District, Yuncheng City, Shanxi Province. Being falsely accused to the Salt Lake District Court, Lin Jing, a court judge, forged a conciliation statement without trial (as evidenced by the retrial judgment of the original court). However, because Judge Lin Jing has been transferred to the Yellow River TV Station in Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, and officials at all levels have sheltered each other, Judge Lin Jing has been unable to escape legal sanctions. Don't re-identify the original IOUs. Now I want to ask a lawyer with a sense of justice to get justice for me at all costs.
My telephone number is 0359-895685 1.