The technical term of improper evidence collection is "illegal evidence collection", which is a new word invented in Shanghai. Although there are only two or three differences between "improper evidence collection" and "illegal evidence collection", the concept of rule of law behind it is quite different.
"Illegal evidence collection" refers to the way of obtaining evidence, while "illegal evidence collection" emphasizes the qualitative nature of evidence effectiveness. If "improper evidence collection" is not defined as "illegal evidence collection", then "improper evidence collection" may be legalized in the judiciary and the probability of recurrence in law enforcement is relatively high.
Extended data
Improper evidence collection-analysis;
The belated justice of the "10 14" incident was bought by Sun Zhongjie's self-destruction struggle. The overwhelming questioning of public opinion stems from the fear and hatred of various hidden rules of illegal law enforcement in today's society, which also shows that we do not fully trust these hidden rules of illegal law enforcement for the time being.
If the soil and background that breeds these hidden rules of law enforcement still exist, the public has reason to worry that even if the "10 14" incident can be thoroughly investigated from the bottom up, the hidden rules of fishing law enforcement in Shanghai and other regions will at best "stay put" for a while, and after the "wind" has passed, they will still resurface and make waves.
Because, compared with the strong law enforcement departments, the public in a weak position can only submit to humiliation and accept punishment even if they are "fished". Not many people are "bloody" to self-mutilation, chest opening and finger amputation to prove their innocence. In this sense, people from all walks of life should not be too optimistic, thinking that these bloody lessons can arouse the conscience of those who have vested interests in illegal law enforcement.
Baidu encyclopedia-improper evidence collection