Confusion about the law

Your idea is extreme, although it is reasonable, because it is difficult for people who have committed crimes to find a normal job again. To make a living, it's easy to get back to your old job. But if you read history, the Qin dynasty severely punished the cool law. As long as the law is violated, what is the result? China's first feudal dynasty disappeared decades later.

Law is the bottom line, and morality is a higher requirement for people. If the two are equated, can those who were born in poverty or suffered from natural and man-made disasters survive? For example, the law does not prevent civilians from being destroyed, but it is against morality. But if this item is written into the law, everyone will save a drowning child. Can you guarantee that there will be no disaster in such chaos? Just like the eldest student, he sacrificed himself and saved a dying life. How to evaluate?

China's laws are not perfect, and there are even many colors of rule by man, but you can't think that strictness is progress. To see a miracle, we must first give the miracle worker a chance. In fact, China's laws can't be said to cover up crimes, but there are also provisions that give a heavier punishment to recidivists and don't apply probation.