We should restore the punishment of that year, because the law is too good for the wicked.

The deterrent of punishment lies not in severity, but in inevitability. It is not that the harsher the punishment, the better the public order and the fewer bad guys, but that "as long as you commit a crime, you can't escape punishment." Only in this way will people not try to do business at a loss of 100%. As the saying goes, Skynet is long and slow, but it doesn't leak.

For example, the punishment of corrupt officials in the Ming Dynasty can be said to be extremely severe, with all kinds of specimens, but the result is that the more anti-corruption, the more corrupt the country.

However, it should be noted that the detection rate of 100% should not be violated. Otherwise, extorting confessions by torture will be rampant, human rights will be trampled on, human rights will be greatly destroyed, and everyone will be in a state of constant fear.

The criminal procedure law has two functions, one is to protect human rights, and the other is to punish crimes. We must put the protection of human rights before punishing crimes, and establish the concept of "it is better to let go of 3 thousand than to wronged one person" so that public power will not expand to the point of trampling on human rights.