Why did the case of the missing female teacher in Shanxi open the coffin again after the 17th?

June 5438 In October 2003, the sensational "disappearance case of a female teacher in Linyi" in Shanxi attracted attention again 17 years after the victim's family hunted for the murderer. It was July 2003, and the victim Lu was found in a well, but the police did not do a DNA test (the victim's brother said the police did not do it). Police heard Lu's husband Wang admitted hurting his wife. After being controlled, Wang claimed that he woke up his wife after turning on the lights while playing mahjong. They had a fight. Later, Wang covered his wife's head with a quilt and found that she was no longer breathing. Wang wrapped her in a quilt, carried her out of the school gate, and placed her in a rotten room at the school gate. When he returned home, he pushed her out of the gap in the school gate. motorcycle. He also brought a fruit knife, hit her on the head with a brick, and stabbed her with a knife. This behavior is outrageous. After that, she wrapped Lu's body, tied it to the back seat of a motorcycle, stripped his wife naked, and threw it into an irrigation well in a field more than 10 miles away. Then I went to an open space, poured gasoline on the quilt and clothes, burned it, and threw away the fruit knife. ?

But in the second trial, did Wang rely on the defender’s statement? The prosecutor found insufficient evidence to accuse him of a crime, so he was not found guilty? He reversed his confession in court and denied that he had committed the crime. Wang's defender said that the first point: his highly decomposed body should be identified through DNA or skull matching technology to identify whether the unknown body is that of Lu; the second point: the villagers confirmed that the things salvaged like carrion were not included in the autopsy report. Display; The third point: The report confirmed that the wound became shallower from top to bottom, which is inconsistent with Wang’s confession; The fourth point: Wang confessed that he pinched his wife with his hands first, but the report did not record the hyoid bone, throat bone, Lung; Point 5: The defendant had some knowledge of the location of the well, but he took the wrong route twice when identifying it. This cannot prove that the well where the body was found was the well mentioned by the defendant; Point 6: There was no evidence of burning quilts and clothes, and the motorcycle Neither the car keys nor the knife were found. Point 7: Wang stated that the number of victims was stabbed in a dilapidated house at the school gate, but there was no blood in the room. The court held that Wang retracted his confession because the public security officers used torture to extract and induce confessions. There was a lack of sufficient and necessary evidence and a complete chain of evidence, and the accusation against Wang was untenable. The Intermediate People's Court of Yuncheng City, Shanxi Province ruled that Wang was not guilty and dismissed the claims of the attached civil litigant.

The victims’ families were not satisfied with the outcome of the trial. They found blood-stained soil at the school gate, but there was too little blood to detect the results, so they lost an important piece of evidence. The police did not provide a DNA test, but the local police always emphasized that the police had no problems handling the case at the time, which made people Very doubtful. The victim's father, who has a net worth of more than $654.38 million, decided to come up with clues about how to receive his pension. The case has been open for 17 years, and they must tell the truth. Faced with this question, the relevant staff of the Linyi County Public Security Bureau task force did not give a positive response. ?

I hope that the subsequent development of this matter will bring justice to the families of the victims.