How does Wulitou Haug in Northeast China rectify all kinds of dissatisfaction?

The traditional director's basic skills, photography methods and editing methods have nothing to do with this film. The director is completely free to make according to his own thoughts and feelings. In my opinion, all kinds of attempts of "innovative filmmakers trying to make new movies" in the domestic film industry and the complete denial and destruction of those traditional ways have nothing to do with this film, because there is no artificial and rigid gesture in this film to distinguish right from wrong. In the past, movies in Northeast China have always been made around changchun film studio. Li Ping probably doesn't know this long-standing orthodox film production system. Therefore, he will not completely deny it, and there is no need to destroy what he doesn't know. In terms of shooting skills, the highlight of this film lies in the repeated use of improvisation methods. Although still free and unrestrained, it has generated great interest.

Back to the theme, the plot of this movie can be summed up in one word, cruel and funny. From the perspective of ridicule, the film brings violence, power and primitive desire for money and women from rural areas to cities. There are three protagonists in the film, one is the capitalist of "Blue Million", the other is the violent believer of myna, and the other is the poor proletarians of Hao Ge and his brothers. The film shows their respective living conditions with a seemingly funny but realistic story. Brother Hao is a village bully who feels good about himself. He has been living in a world where he has advantages and a sense of security, and the ending of the story is expected, and he has been baptized by reality. His younger brothers "Old Five" and "Old Six" are the most common social classes in life. There are countless "fifth" and "sixth" figures around us. They don't pay attention to hygiene, which affects the city appearance and is full of foul language. I also think there are many names in this film, but how can you erase them online and pretend that there is no reality for them? Some people worry that children will learn badly after reading it. I don't deny that I agree that the internet is a double-edged sword. Minors often have a high desire to explore the words "/kloc-no entry under 0/8 years old". In order to attract browsing, many websites do not grade or comment on some videos and articles for everyone to see. But I don't think this is a sin that a small movie should bear, it is the responsibility of the whole society. If you unplug the power, children can also learn when you pick up soap. For those who criticize the film with disdain, I can only say that elegance and vulgarity are not absolute, it depends on your mentality. You can resist your original impulse, because you are an adult, but you can't get rid of it. At some point, you will choose to swear, because you are an ordinary person after all.